Iroquois Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Iroquois Single Female Poverty
25.7%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.70% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Iroquois Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.053% | 11.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 99.9% | 88.3% |
Mean | 16.9% | 41.3% |
Median | 10.5% | 32.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 46.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.4% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.8% | 25.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 24.8% |
Correlation Details
Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.053% | 201,983,620 | 22.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 2,670,403 | 27.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 520,415 | 27.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 203,636 | 23.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 285,332 | 30.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 27,278 | 22.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 48,502 | 32.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 38,001 | 37.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 9,024 | 46.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 4,814 | 45.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 1,711 | 21.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,759 | 47.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 522 | 24.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.18% | 697 | 46.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 17.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 10,112 | 17.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 33.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 36 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.49% | 505 | 11.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.33% | 1,744 | 16.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 1,976 | 11.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.32% | 235 | 80.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 44.8% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 37.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 60.6% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 28.9% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 32.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 100.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 29.7% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 42.9% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,196 | 71.5% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 70.4% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 66 | 100.0% |