Uruguayan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Uruguayan Single Female Poverty
20.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,837,387 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 20.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.8% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Uruguayans and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Uruguayans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Uruguayans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Uruguayan Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.040% | 9.0% |
| Maximum | 23.6% | 83.3% |
| Range | 23.5% | 74.3% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 32.4% |
| Median | 2.0% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.94% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 53.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 36.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 24.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 24.1% |
Correlation Details
| Uruguayan Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.040% | 125,706,868 | 22.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 11,489,462 | 19.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 2,685,091 | 19.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 1,575,649 | 18.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 840,074 | 17.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 512,213 | 17.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 199,008 | 18.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 247,923 | 19.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 237,582 | 19.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 133,798 | 14.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 70,523 | 11.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 52,551 | 9.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 69,004 | 21.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 6,811 | 62.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 1,747 | 53.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 1,659 | 15.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 1,250 | 76.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 506 | 20.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 361 | 83.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 313 | 83.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.63% | 4,553 | 12.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.20% | 250 | 60.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.56% | 191 | 50.0% |