Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
20.7%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.53% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Costa Ricans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Costa Ricans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 16.6% | 69.6% |
| Range | 16.5% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 25.8% |
| Median | 3.2% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 30.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 13.7% |
Correlation Details
| Costa Rican Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 192,947,612 | 22.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 35,080,546 | 19.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 11,070,165 | 19.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 4,792,625 | 19.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,775,429 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,645,290 | 18.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 865,859 | 22.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 606,902 | 18.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 329,100 | 21.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 272,556 | 23.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 171,585 | 22.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 122,166 | 28.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 139,055 | 20.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 71,223 | 27.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 192,015 | 19.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 88,646 | 23.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 35,645 | 29.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 20,417 | 11.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 7,644 | 6.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 42,871 | 10.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 30,438 | 30.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 70,544 | 23.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 40,321 | 14.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 6,312 | 23.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 21,040 | 29.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 581 | 41.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 1,273 | 20.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,292 | 20.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 21,507 | 27.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 28,164 | 36.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 8,201 | 6.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 7,125 | 69.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 501 | 52.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 616 | 36.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.42% | 277 | 50.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 1,519 | 24.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 1,594 | 11.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,373 | 34.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 5,226 | 34.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 9,676 | 16.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 915 | 47.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.41% | 297 | 33.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 14,778 | 15.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 11,906 | 18.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 98 | 66.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 4,771 | 10.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 253 | 10.5% |