Central American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Central American Indian Single Female Poverty
25.5%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,666,158 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 25.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.1% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Central American Indians and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Central American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Central American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Central American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.074% | 11.0% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.4% | 89.0% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 37.6% |
| Median | 5.2% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 24.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 49.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 18.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 18.2% |
Correlation Details
| Central American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.074% | 189,950,428 | 21.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 68,037,034 | 22.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 36,754,107 | 23.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 12,330,592 | 26.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 5,618,537 | 25.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 3,716,215 | 25.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 2,087,167 | 26.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 1,049,119 | 31.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 825,657 | 23.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 941,971 | 24.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 631,884 | 25.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 260,814 | 38.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 277,449 | 25.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 128,478 | 22.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 169,993 | 26.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 87,135 | 24.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 86,623 | 33.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 64,212 | 22.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 104,437 | 47.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 71,791 | 31.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 65,315 | 28.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 25,035 | 11.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 41,714 | 12.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.89% | 13,457 | 19.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 4,806 | 40.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 37,203 | 25.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 12,951 | 34.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 39,457 | 35.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 4,412 | 35.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.90% | 5,775 | 56.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 9,742 | 26.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 3,860 | 28.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 14,201 | 44.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.82% | 20,869 | 38.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 7,577 | 58.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.31% | 507 | 21.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.53% | 39,406 | 56.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 3,807 | 23.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.57% | 185 | 33.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 530 | 30.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,663 | 37.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.30% | 795 | 11.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.23% | 1,181 | 56.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 1,324 | 39.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 736 | 91.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.59% | 11,179 | 50.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.39% | 4,162 | 21.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,386 | 36.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 141 | 50.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.75% | 1,396 | 50.4% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.01% | 1,130 | 38.6% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16% | 3,233 | 59.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.54% | 2,190 | 31.9% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.16% | 2,658 | 66.4% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.78% | 1,632 | 53.5% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.95% | 25,542 | 51.1% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.46% | 4,562 | 44.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.32% | 362 | 100.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.40% | 1,488 | 89.9% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.88% | 37,642 | 55.3% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.48% | 15,304 | 47.9% |