Immigrants from Thailand Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Thailand Single Female Poverty
22.0%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,832,710 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 22.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.5% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Thailand influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Thailand simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Welsh (22.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Spaniard (22.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish (22.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Tlingit-Haida (21.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants from Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants from Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spaniards | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spanish | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
| French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
Immigrants from Thailand Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 17.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 17.6% | 93.0% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 33.5% |
| Median | 2.8% | 27.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 37.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 19.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 19.6% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Thailand Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 195,988,196 | 21.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 65,728,323 | 19.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 23,281,830 | 19.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 11,666,813 | 20.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 5,894,963 | 21.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 2,975,035 | 20.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 2,317,612 | 25.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 1,062,535 | 21.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 661,014 | 26.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 781,130 | 25.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 469,655 | 23.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 331,406 | 26.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 499,825 | 26.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 438,933 | 23.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 188,684 | 23.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 243,454 | 25.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 103,455 | 33.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 76,754 | 27.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 156,678 | 33.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 124,137 | 39.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 86,216 | 28.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.35% | 18,735 | 7.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 18,110 | 36.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 316,218 | 27.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 22,125 | 14.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 46,516 | 35.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.98% | 58,221 | 22.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 42,880 | 38.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 1,414 | 33.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.30% | 15,651 | 37.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 668 | 57.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.49% | 84,985 | 28.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.63% | 17,008 | 43.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 6,065 | 37.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 3,496 | 20.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 540 | 39.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 987 | 36.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.00% | 80 | 22.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.51% | 399 | 26.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.93% | 58,959 | 27.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.19% | 921 | 33.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 1,045 | 58.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.63% | 19,613 | 41.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 19,501 | 39.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.87% | 262 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.38% | 96 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.57% | 1,132 | 100.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.50% | 32 | 33.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.62% | 403 | 13.3% |