Burmese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Burmese Single Female Poverty
18.3%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Burmese and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Burmese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Burmese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants from Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants from China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants from Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants from Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants from Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants from Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Burmese Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 53.9% | 43.2% |
| Range | 53.7% | 41.3% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 16.0% |
| Median | 9.8% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 6.5% |
Correlation Details
| Burmese Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 191,313,881 | 24.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 108,967,844 | 21.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 51,012,743 | 19.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.07% | 34,290,262 | 19.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 16,980,263 | 17.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 13,425,243 | 15.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 8,110,034 | 16.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 5,225,145 | 15.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 3,712,617 | 14.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 7,009,065 | 20.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 2,233,784 | 14.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 1,683,544 | 16.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 1,399,478 | 16.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 1,162,180 | 17.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 986,762 | 17.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 581,228 | 14.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 927,454 | 14.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.43% | 759,853 | 12.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.74% | 288,807 | 10.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 778,779 | 14.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.37% | 326,521 | 15.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.73% | 207,064 | 15.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 238,869 | 11.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 245,495 | 17.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.67% | 118,588 | 23.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.86% | 470,149 | 21.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.34% | 67,686 | 25.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.62% | 128,562 | 18.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.87% | 262,870 | 12.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.19% | 98,479 | 10.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.51% | 119,192 | 19.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 126,071 | 11.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.12% | 112,156 | 10.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.51% | 27,609 | 6.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.77% | 206,083 | 13.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.03% | 282,578 | 14.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 36,214 | 9.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 59,410 | 23.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 47,099 | 11.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 258,296 | 18.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.04% | 49,955 | 10.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.19% | 229,745 | 13.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.57% | 72,859 | 18.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.81% | 93,823 | 23.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.44% | 22,723 | 16.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 133,255 | 13.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.03% | 40,767 | 12.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.64% | 15,522 | 2.9% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.41% | 20,092 | 7.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 32,344 | 9.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.38% | 30,598 | 6.9% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.58% | 5,495 | 17.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.45% | 28,788 | 27.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.01% | 39,049 | 16.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.22% | 23,546 | 7.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.48% | 132,379 | 15.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.80% | 22,930 | 1.8% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.51% | 17,110 | 43.2% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.71% | 37,754 | 26.9% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.72% | 43,169 | 19.8% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.19% | 18,564 | 26.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.45% | 11,314 | 8.1% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.89% | 40,462 | 20.5% |