Immigrants from Vietnam Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Vietnam
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Vietnam Single Female Poverty
19.8%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Vietnam Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,564,765 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 19.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Vietnam within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Vietnam influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Vietnam simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Vietnam by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Ukrainian (19.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Malaysia (19.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Sierra Leonean (19.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Vietnamese (19.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 84.1 /100 | #85 | Excellent 19.7% |
| Zimbabweans | 84.0 /100 | #86 | Excellent 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 84.0 /100 | #87 | Excellent 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 83.9 /100 | #88 | Excellent 19.8% |
| Vietnamese | 83.8 /100 | #89 | Excellent 19.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 83.8 /100 | #90 | Excellent 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 83.8 /100 | #91 | Excellent 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 83.6 /100 | #92 | Excellent 19.8% |
| Ukrainians | 83.6 /100 | #93 | Excellent 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 83.5 /100 | #94 | Excellent 19.9% |
| Italians | 83.3 /100 | #95 | Excellent 19.9% |
| Immigrants from Afghanistan | 83.3 /100 | #96 | Excellent 19.9% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 83.1 /100 | #97 | Excellent 19.9% |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 83.0 /100 | #98 | Excellent 20.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #99 | Excellent 20.0% |
Immigrants from Vietnam Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Vietnam Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.14% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 31.4% | 33.3% |
| Range | 31.2% | 28.9% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 18.3% |
| Median | 9.2% | 19.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 5.8% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Vietnam Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 231,118,002 | 23.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 79,073,022 | 20.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 29,236,079 | 19.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 17,824,283 | 20.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 8,967,473 | 19.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 8,605,346 | 18.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 4,603,138 | 18.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 2,744,063 | 17.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 1,784,577 | 19.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 1,341,312 | 16.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 911,581 | 19.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 1,536,083 | 20.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 847,659 | 19.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 593,343 | 19.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.78% | 559,285 | 15.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 247,986 | 18.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.49% | 546,470 | 21.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 319,610 | 20.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 208,185 | 14.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.52% | 238,774 | 18.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.86% | 211,819 | 22.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.13% | 86,988 | 22.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.43% | 86,142 | 21.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.77% | 328,984 | 21.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 1,178,189 | 14.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.46% | 126,897 | 24.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.79% | 166,047 | 15.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.23% | 275,906 | 20.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.49% | 252,281 | 16.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86% | 167,775 | 20.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 31,566 | 7.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.04% | 19,338 | 13.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.62% | 7,323 | 22.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.22% | 59,500 | 12.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.08% | 68,667 | 25.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.55% | 101,697 | 24.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 1,398 | 9.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 143,180 | 15.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.82% | 69,732 | 21.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.18% | 7,653 | 4.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.98% | 55,192 | 19.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.27% | 967 | 5.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 125,064 | 18.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.49% | 47,305 | 8.8% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.95% | 60,512 | 11.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.44% | 52,685 | 11.4% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.50% | 6,572 | 33.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.09% | 172,708 | 20.8% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.03% | 3,054 | 8.0% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.37% | 37,663 | 11.3% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.57% | 34,650 | 31.7% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.29% | 612 | 22.2% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.80% | 48,413 | 21.1% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.50% | 199,414 | 22.1% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.38% | 22,601 | 28.4% |