Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Celtic Single Female Poverty
23.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
67.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,042,177 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 23.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.1% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Celtics and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Celtics influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Celtics simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Bangladesh (23.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Caribbean (23.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (23.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Belizean (23.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (23.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 68.4 /100 | #248 | Good 22.8% |
| Immigrants from Micronesia | 68.3 /100 | #249 | Good 22.9% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 68.3 /100 | #250 | Good 22.9% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 67.9 /100 | #251 | Good 22.9% |
| British West Indians | 67.7 /100 | #252 | Good 23.0% |
| Belizeans | 67.5 /100 | #253 | Good 23.0% |
| Immigrants from Caribbean | 67.3 /100 | #254 | Good 23.1% |
| Celtics | 67.3 /100 | #255 | Good 23.1% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 67.2 /100 | #256 | Good 23.1% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 67.1 /100 | #257 | Good 23.1% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 66.9 /100 | #258 | Good 23.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 66.6 /100 | #259 | Good 23.2% |
| Immigrants from Belize | 66.2 /100 | #260 | Good 23.3% |
| Senegalese | 66.1 /100 | #261 | Good 23.3% |
| Sudanese | 65.9 /100 | #262 | Good 23.3% |
Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 8.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 8.6% | 96.1% |
| Mean | 2.0% | 32.3% |
| Median | 1.7% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.84% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 37.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 16.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 19.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 19.5% |
Correlation Details
| Celtic Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 144,792,353 | 23.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.094% | 17,719,971 | 21.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 5,029,838 | 21.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 3,114,540 | 21.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,084,100 | 23.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 509,597 | 23.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 461,641 | 22.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 159,379 | 21.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 190,458 | 25.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 223,578 | 20.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 210,609 | 19.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 98,065 | 28.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 80,585 | 27.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 33,391 | 29.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 29,275 | 36.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 22,922 | 22.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 40,546 | 27.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 27,654 | 39.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 13,754 | 27.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 22,044 | 17.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 12,022 | 33.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 9,707 | 25.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 21,617 | 26.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 11,593 | 37.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 2,630 | 20.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 3,449 | 23.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 4,349 | 3.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 4,343 | 13.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 25,569 | 45.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 1,984 | 24.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 12,650 | 33.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 5,459 | 62.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 896 | 16.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 5,242 | 42.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 127 | 33.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.44% | 21,847 | 38.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 388 | 31.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 945 | 63.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 5,451 | 38.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 1,618 | 84.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.05% | 7,092 | 30.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 3,882 | 13.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 2,159 | 12.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 1,980 | 21.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 103 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 1,520 | 34.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 112 | 12.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 7,370 | 43.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 236 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30% | 1,152 | 31.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.57% | 385 | 52.2% |