Navajo Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,343,663 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 31.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in poverty level among single females.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Navajo and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Navajo influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Navajo simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Navajo by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 2.4%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 3.3%), Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Ute	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 28.4%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 28.6%
Immigrants from Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 28.9%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 29.1%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 29.4%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 30.3%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 30.4%
Cajuns	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 30.6%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 31.3%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 31.7%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 32.4%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 33.0%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 33.8%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #346	Tragic 34.1%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #347	Tragic 34.2%

Navajo Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Navajo Data	Single Female Poverty Data
Minimum	0.078%	7.0%
Maximum	100.0%	71.4%
Range	99.9%	64.4%
Mean	50.4%	38.1%
Median	46.8%	38.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.1%	27.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	88.3%	46.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	75.2%	19.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	36.0%	13.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	35.8%	13.0%

Correlation Details

Navajo Percentile	Sample Size	Single Female Poverty
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078%	207,944,895	22.7%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71%	7,522,167	22.4%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15%	4,088,299	22.9%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72%	979,686	25.8%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22%	564,803	22.7%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68%	278,773	29.5%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11%	758,173	24.9%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.74%	146,645	24.6%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20%	102,077	28.8%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56%	38,337	42.1%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22%	96,192	33.8%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.68%	30,944	34.3%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22%	9,192	43.9%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79%	7,217	61.7%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.86%	41,224	26.4%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.82%	126,495	30.3%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28%	4,858	56.4%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80%	17,435	53.7%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.23%	48,425	29.4%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.73%	494	40.0%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.20%	8,832	9.1%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.73%	452	40.0%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.22%	4,567	41.6%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11%	1,236	30.9%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.61%	6,302	36.7%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.03%	343	57.1%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.76%	411	66.7%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.89%	4,488	22.8%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.16%	2,793	15.7%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.75%	2,375	29.7%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.22%	10,362	23.1%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.59%	1,093	69.3%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.14%	14,980	48.6%
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.33%	583	25.1%
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.25%	3,345	23.6%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.83%	7,430	43.8%
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16%	4,834	61.2%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.52%	46,457	32.9%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57%	4,858	31.5%
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.29%	46,398	39.5%
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.25%	5,317	39.4%
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.30%	4,842	41.2%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.82%	8,943	47.0%
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.17%	188	11.1%
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.63%	1,504	23.9%
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.72%	9,175	38.5%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.36%	22,997	37.8%
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.82%	22,666	37.2%
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.68%	16,651	39.9%
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.43%	8,855	22.2%
[ 61.5% - 62.0% ] 61.69%	2,665	43.1%
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.33%	1,489	54.5%
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.27%	10,785	18.8%
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.44%	1,612	31.2%
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.80%	1,938	45.9%
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.13%	5,600	45.9%
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.24%	1,482	49.5%
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.81%	1,552	22.7%
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.50%	1,607	39.6%
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.68%	494	24.0%
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.65%	4,345	49.6%
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.78%	11,541	28.6%
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.04%	526	7.0%
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.57%	211	50.0%
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.91%	1,039	45.3%
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.74%	2,653	31.7%
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.30%	8,372	25.3%
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.03%	2,945	60.4%
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.71%	238	27.3%
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.35%	762	37.5%
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.56%	868	27.3%
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.28%	435	50.0%
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.60%	7,238	47.1%
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.34%	722	71.4%
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.73%	867	54.0%
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.22%	2,137	37.5%
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.84%	11,403	38.8%
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.07%	9,234	43.9%
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.68%	8,067	36.5%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.32%	8,411	57.0%
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.75%	19,851	37.8%
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.34%	3,932	44.4%
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.92%	8,846	39.4%
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.20%	27,550	37.5%
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.66%	6,329	44.9%
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.36%	13,953	49.9%
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.81%	9,553	35.2%
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.30%	6,750	38.2%
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.72%	16,594	46.5%
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.25%	2,729	46.1%
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.87%	9,799	46.8%
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.34%	3,863	42.7%
[ 98.5% - 99.0% ] 98.90%	5,369	48.7%
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.29%	11,442	45.8%
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00%	6,257	49.2%

Navajo Single Female Poverty

COMPARE

Navajo Single Female PovertyTragic

Navajo Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Navajo by Single Female Poverty

Navajo Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Navajo Single Female Poverty
Tragic