Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Chinese
21.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
5.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,536,912 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 36.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Chinese |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 43.3% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 25.9% | 16.1% |
| Median | 23.9% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (21.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (22.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ghana (21.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Thailand (22.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spaniards | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spanish | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |