Immigrants from Middle Africa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Middle Africa Single Female Poverty
22.3%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,606,644 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 22.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.6% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Middle Africa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Middle Africa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants from El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants from West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.047% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 9.0% | 44.1% |
Range | 8.9% | 42.0% |
Mean | 2.9% | 19.9% |
Median | 2.5% | 21.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.0% | 24.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 8.5% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Middle Africa Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.047% | 131,699,815 | 22.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 32,892,308 | 23.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 14,986,647 | 22.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 7,391,609 | 22.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 4,543,037 | 24.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 2,644,648 | 22.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 1,553,088 | 20.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 945,871 | 21.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 920,146 | 21.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 882,767 | 21.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 615,845 | 23.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 275,490 | 26.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 227,605 | 23.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 292,251 | 24.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 292,185 | 23.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 171,914 | 25.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 117,309 | 27.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 153,287 | 25.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 194,542 | 18.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 125,148 | 12.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 10,536 | 44.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 9,486 | 26.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 104,980 | 14.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 49,856 | 23.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 19,888 | 16.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 3,648 | 3.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 43,554 | 10.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 125,905 | 19.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 2,330 | 3.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 12,128 | 38.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 69,634 | 21.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 75,988 | 10.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 28,427 | 11.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 16,426 | 2.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 27,909 | 12.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 26,684 | 26.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 21,985 | 26.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 2,699 | 8.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 13,580 | 8.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.99% | 15,489 | 17.7% |