Chippewa Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.16% in poverty level among single females.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chippewa and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chippewa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Chippewa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Somalia	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 25.8%
Ottawa	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 26.0%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 26.3%
Blacks/African Americans	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 26.4%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 26.4%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 26.6%
Seminole	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 26.8%
Chippewa	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 26.8%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 26.9%
Choctaw	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 27.2%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 27.4%
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 27.5%
Apache	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 27.7%
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 27.8%
Hopi	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 28.0%

Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chippewa Data	Single Female Poverty Data
Minimum	0.066%	11.9%
Maximum	100.0%	87.6%
Range	99.9%	75.7%
Mean	41.6%	38.7%
Median	37.4%	35.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.2%	26.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.9%	47.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	56.7%	21.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	31.7%	16.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	31.5%	16.4%

Correlation Details

Chippewa Percentile	Sample Size	Single Female Poverty
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.066%	203,462,042	22.2%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70%	5,906,262	22.3%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16%	1,801,528	25.9%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72%	482,362	30.9%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21%	410,857	30.0%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64%	326,938	26.3%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26%	116,408	29.9%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72%	88,868	24.4%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34%	80,135	35.5%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67%	37,746	24.8%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20%	21,911	33.5%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.73%	13,979	27.9%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.30%	2,048	44.8%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78%	7,922	38.3%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.31%	14,295	51.5%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.86%	20,674	35.8%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.40%	5,427	27.9%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.69%	4,167	40.3%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.36%	40,035	28.2%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.93%	554	55.2%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.27%	14,908	35.2%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.64%	37,389	41.0%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.44%	18,611	34.2%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.78%	1,299	45.1%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.70%	8,269	38.4%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.20%	7,543	47.9%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.68%	2,448	34.5%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.35%	1,115	16.6%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65%	16,808	35.1%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.20%	2,480	36.9%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.64%	21,121	31.0%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.76%	16,587	34.4%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.13%	2,020	23.6%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.08%	4,309	61.6%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.73%	3,358	11.9%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.68%	3,104	25.7%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.20%	99	25.0%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.48%	258	47.4%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.69%	908	51.7%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.56%	3,290	61.6%
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.03%	795	30.8%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.93%	3,628	31.9%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.92%	4,499	32.2%
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.15%	2,504	32.2%
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.50%	873	38.5%
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.26%	248	18.8%
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.10%	1,139	40.7%
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.48%	406	22.2%
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.44%	6,234	24.0%
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.29%	28	40.0%
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.67%	96	50.0%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.81%	1,731	47.7%
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.65%	575	20.0%
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.99%	2,863	35.4%
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.03%	382	62.1%
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.68%	1,819	26.7%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.27%	858	18.0%
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.82%	1,838	24.3%
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.84%	6,540	38.1%
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.39%	494	24.1%
[ 49.5% - 50.0% ] 49.83%	299	72.0%
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.53%	1,011	20.5%
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.88%	2,969	46.3%
[ 53.0% - 53.5% ] 53.12%	32	33.3%
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.37%	607	50.0%
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.80%	776	47.6%
[ 57.5% - 58.0% ] 57.97%	395	16.7%
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.07%	237	37.0%
[ 62.5% - 63.0% ] 62.67%	1,733	42.4%
[ 63.5% - 64.0% ] 63.76%	1,228	48.3%
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79%	839	45.1%
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.47%	683	67.9%
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.98%	733	66.2%
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.82%	2,940	49.2%
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.23%	146	83.3%
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.74%	613	60.3%
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.43%	219	32.4%
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.29%	1,026	37.7%
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.56%	2,117	46.3%
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.88%	323	29.2%
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.36%	550	87.6%
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.78%	472	55.2%
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.68%	190	80.8%
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.28%	318	83.3%
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.67%	285	24.2%
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.40%	2,071	27.6%
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.28%	895	29.6%
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.13%	203	14.3%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.31%	39	40.0%
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.90%	7,355	25.4%
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.16%	2,960	24.4%
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.75%	1,011	35.7%
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.58%	789	25.6%
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.42%	852	44.8%
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.17%	1,202	62.8%
[ 98.5% - 99.0% ] 98.73%	1,183	29.5%
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00%	95	81.2%

Chippewa Single Female Poverty

COMPARE

Chippewa Single Female PovertyTragic

Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty

Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Chippewa Single Female Poverty
Tragic