Immigrants from Romania Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Romania Single Female Poverty
18.8%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,376,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591 and weighted average of 18.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.6% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Romania influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Romania simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants from Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants from Romania Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 5.2% |
| Maximum | 14.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 14.5% | 94.8% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 21.4% |
| Median | 1.6% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.78% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 15.5% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Romania Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 129,457,803 | 22.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.088% | 50,461,904 | 18.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 34,649,092 | 20.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 14,792,021 | 19.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 7,005,218 | 15.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 4,991,572 | 16.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 3,477,511 | 17.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 2,153,582 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 1,679,844 | 18.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 1,454,336 | 18.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 747,682 | 16.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 584,347 | 13.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 654,565 | 19.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 272,906 | 17.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 493,196 | 15.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 235,550 | 17.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 108,301 | 18.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 125,393 | 20.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 75,807 | 27.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 184,074 | 18.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 43,084 | 19.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 172,417 | 11.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 45,382 | 10.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.46% | 51,616 | 20.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 29,863 | 35.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 1,380 | 34.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 9,519 | 9.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 3,212 | 21.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 62,568 | 5.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 7,400 | 12.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 93,713 | 19.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 51,712 | 11.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 61,030 | 27.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 2,405 | 7.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 41,134 | 18.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 11,062 | 6.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 523 | 48.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 2,027 | 23.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 26,536 | 8.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 14,652 | 40.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 1,125 | 11.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 1,402 | 23.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 1,048 | 15.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 852 | 13.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 26,939 | 13.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 909 | 16.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 5,555 | 6.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 268 | 60.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 98 | 50.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.10% | 1,885 | 17.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.49% | 214 | 100.0% |