Latvian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Latvian Single Female Poverty
19.0%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,777,893 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 19.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.5% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Latvians and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Latvians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Latvians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Latvian Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 6.0% |
| Maximum | 12.9% | 90.7% |
| Range | 12.8% | 84.7% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 24.7% |
| Median | 1.5% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.74% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 16.4% |
Correlation Details
| Latvian Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 160,981,798 | 21.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.100% | 36,859,643 | 18.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 9,760,919 | 17.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,207,435 | 16.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 2,371,601 | 15.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 1,200,071 | 21.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 535,125 | 21.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 561,305 | 12.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 400,927 | 18.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 217,687 | 12.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 154,492 | 17.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 81,648 | 28.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 98,038 | 21.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 63,851 | 13.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 91,703 | 12.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 4,988 | 41.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 28,690 | 18.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 868 | 26.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31% | 8,312 | 32.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 18,746 | 19.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 11,214 | 17.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 42,997 | 14.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 1,494 | 14.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 9,909 | 23.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 4,502 | 33.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 9,390 | 18.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.90% | 2,842 | 32.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 464 | 18.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 19,881 | 6.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 2,794 | 25.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 556 | 50.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 2,010 | 24.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 133 | 60.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 8,425 | 13.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 459 | 76.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 1,472 | 16.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 1,091 | 18.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 1,841 | 13.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 4,611 | 22.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 771 | 18.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 449 | 23.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 2,313 | 23.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 428 | 90.7% |