Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.00004% in poverty level among single females.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from China influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from China simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants from Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 17.8%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 17.9%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 17.9%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 18.0%
Immigrants from Korea	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants from Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants from China	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants from Greece	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 18.3%
Maltese	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 18.3%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 18.3%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 18.3%
Armenians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants from Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants from Israel	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 18.3%

Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China Data	Single Female Poverty Data
Minimum	0.17%	7.4%
Maximum	46.3%	33.3%
Range	46.1%	25.9%
Mean	15.7%	16.3%
Median	13.9%	15.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.8%	13.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.7%	18.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	15.9%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.8%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.7%	4.5%

Correlation Details

Immigrants from China Percentile	Sample Size	Single Female Poverty
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17%	217,259,854	23.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54%	91,442,927	20.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95%	37,536,633	18.8%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33%	24,646,551	20.0%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73%	13,439,167	18.5%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10%	9,903,447	17.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52%	4,811,609	16.9%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91%	5,655,826	16.7%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29%	4,922,205	17.9%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66%	2,972,028	16.0%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01%	2,761,638	15.7%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58%	11,742,164	22.6%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83%	1,583,167	15.2%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24%	1,019,826	17.5%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64%	2,230,513	13.9%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01%	674,395	13.7%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.40%	1,039,504	14.5%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77%	993,572	15.8%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.15%	1,027,981	16.3%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.62%	646,060	13.5%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 8.00%	942,576	14.5%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.39%	853,225	13.9%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76%	318,315	13.7%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.04%	671,767	13.6%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.56%	422,978	15.7%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.88%	604,428	14.9%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25%	263,373	20.1%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70%	342,572	14.1%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.99%	428,607	21.5%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41%	529,269	11.8%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.79%	141,976	26.1%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.35%	1,056,987	16.0%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68%	363,548	16.1%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.06%	270,295	19.9%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40%	352,111	14.1%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86%	120,353	23.7%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.28%	38,973	8.9%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63%	91,939	19.4%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.93%	110,434	14.6%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.39%	40,627	15.1%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.11%	183,427	14.1%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.38%	50,637	12.6%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.19%	130,364	23.4%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.02%	111,247	10.7%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.40%	312,200	13.8%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.92%	110,416	13.0%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.18%	235,005	16.3%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.44%	45,650	9.9%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.85%	131,923	9.4%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.98%	14,204	9.5%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.65%	89,075	11.3%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.87%	143,740	12.7%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.31%	102,223	11.5%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68%	85,306	11.4%
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.13%	24,169	16.7%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74%	134,385	27.0%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.09%	151,983	13.5%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46%	28,212	7.4%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.87%	68,923	14.6%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.63%	36,165	17.0%
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.13%	37,340	17.1%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.66%	52,268	17.7%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.73%	87,947	14.4%
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.51%	25,460	17.2%
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.69%	60,386	10.6%
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.09%	430	33.3%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.57%	12,070	23.7%
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.36%	25,001	20.0%
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.69%	26,418	13.4%
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.16%	53,371	18.6%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.27%	79,495	20.3%

Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty

COMPARE

Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty Exceptional

Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Female Poverty

Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty
Exceptional