Yup'ik Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Yup'ik Single Female Poverty
26.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,804,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 26.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.11% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yup'ik and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yup'ik influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Yup'ik simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Yup'ik Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 97.1% |
| Mean | 50.0% | 36.3% |
| Median | 61.0% | 30.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.2% | 42.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 72.3% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.7% | 25.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.4% | 24.8% |
Correlation Details
| Yup'ik Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 38,583,528 | 23.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 250,185 | 20.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 178,242 | 17.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 88,053 | 20.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 88,765 | 25.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 54,200 | 20.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 319,286 | 18.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 17,072 | 19.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 26,698 | 20.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.96% | 30,662 | 12.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 59,649 | 23.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 144 | 66.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 38,572 | 30.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.15% | 1,370 | 30.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.88% | 439 | 46.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.31% | 1,707 | 100.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.71% | 252 | 33.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.07% | 836 | 7.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.84% | 95 | 33.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 90 | 33.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.20% | 912 | 100.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 450 | 40.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.96% | 235 | 31.4% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 630 | 20.0% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 864 | 100.0% |
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.98% | 1,768 | 58.6% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.30% | 1,602 | 40.0% |
[ 60.0% - 60.5% ] 60.14% | 715 | 8.9% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.74% | 2,175 | 30.1% |
[ 61.0% - 61.5% ] 61.34% | 551 | 4.5% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.45% | 2,577 | 29.7% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.78% | 900 | 27.3% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.12% | 6,312 | 2.9% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.36% | 830 | 20.7% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.84% | 8,157 | 12.4% |
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.89% | 760 | 17.2% |
[ 73.0% - 73.5% ] 73.15% | 596 | 46.2% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.79% | 1,442 | 36.6% |
[ 76.0% - 76.5% ] 76.04% | 1,828 | 42.3% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.99% | 843 | 73.6% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.18% | 1,364 | 35.5% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.92% | 4,184 | 49.2% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.82% | 146 | 29.4% |
[ 81.0% - 81.5% ] 81.19% | 1,308 | 43.6% |
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.77% | 616 | 25.0% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.63% | 5,358 | 33.1% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.29% | 992 | 10.0% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.91% | 3,389 | 31.3% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.05% | 88 | 100.0% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.76% | 4,614 | 36.4% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.49% | 614 | 52.8% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.53% | 950 | 14.3% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.40% | 3,128 | 23.3% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.20% | 2,156 | 35.2% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.77% | 62 | 100.0% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.43% | 778 | 25.0% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.43% | 353 | 40.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 413 | 78.1% |