Immigrants from Europe Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Europe
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Europe Single Female Poverty
19.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Europe Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,423,700 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203 and weighted average of 19.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.22% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Europe and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Europe influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Europe simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Europe by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (19.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Palestinian (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (19.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Laotian (19.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants from Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants from Europe Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Europe Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 35.9% | 73.7% |
| Range | 35.6% | 69.3% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 19.5% |
| Median | 12.0% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 20.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 9.6% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Europe Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 140,150,331 | 28.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 127,007,454 | 23.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 79,031,969 | 20.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 49,299,496 | 18.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 39,023,457 | 18.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 22,805,303 | 16.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 18,066,615 | 18.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 10,016,489 | 16.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 7,977,434 | 15.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.72% | 5,238,363 | 15.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 14,051,833 | 21.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.74% | 3,978,341 | 16.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.24% | 2,501,604 | 15.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 2,317,759 | 14.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 1,328,135 | 16.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.77% | 1,070,459 | 14.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 877,890 | 18.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 783,511 | 15.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.26% | 760,205 | 16.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.73% | 396,325 | 17.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.28% | 615,635 | 16.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 101,309 | 22.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 291,627 | 20.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.77% | 485,443 | 18.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.21% | 394,877 | 16.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.74% | 175,063 | 29.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.21% | 288,595 | 15.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.54% | 121,072 | 25.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.19% | 227,991 | 18.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 140,150 | 13.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 239,636 | 18.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.71% | 38,261 | 15.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.24% | 53,359 | 14.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.68% | 121,198 | 14.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 81,712 | 20.2% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.60% | 2,551 | 32.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.25% | 37,330 | 9.8% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.52% | 216 | 25.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.18% | 65,077 | 29.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05% | 29,180 | 19.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.83% | 1,864 | 6.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.65% | 17,166 | 4.4% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.26% | 72,126 | 24.7% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.03% | 23,200 | 13.4% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.80% | 8,942 | 14.8% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.60% | 402 | 73.7% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.45% | 23,676 | 28.7% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.90% | 83,069 | 18.5% |