Immigrants from Jordan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Jordan Single Female Poverty
19.3%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,238,780 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 19.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.37% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Jordan influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Jordan simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Paraguayan (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants from Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants from Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants from Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants from Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants from Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants from Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants from Jordan Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.021% | 6.2% |
Maximum | 6.0% | 58.2% |
Range | 6.0% | 51.9% |
Mean | 1.5% | 18.6% |
Median | 1.3% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.62% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.1% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 8.6% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Jordan Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 82,996,512 | 22.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.057% | 44,355,537 | 22.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.094% | 18,037,989 | 20.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,852,975 | 18.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 5,966,618 | 17.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 3,592,428 | 17.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 2,741,893 | 17.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 2,142,491 | 18.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 1,151,639 | 14.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,118,653 | 16.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 752,396 | 18.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 1,211,607 | 23.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 325,101 | 23.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 448,311 | 15.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 421,777 | 13.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 414,055 | 22.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 354,617 | 16.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 275,678 | 13.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 160,740 | 18.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 266,648 | 16.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 142,255 | 16.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 46,082 | 32.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.86% | 91,989 | 21.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 176,938 | 15.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,562 | 9.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 7,782 | 10.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 72,477 | 24.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 10,403 | 30.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 132,921 | 24.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 82,468 | 25.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 52,627 | 9.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 91,203 | 13.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 79,932 | 31.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 64,439 | 14.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 44,281 | 12.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 12,440 | 11.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 54,590 | 13.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 21,615 | 13.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 14,360 | 31.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 36,930 | 8.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 12,525 | 29.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 14,650 | 9.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 51,537 | 19.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 25,489 | 20.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 1,221 | 58.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 21,760 | 26.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 6,496 | 30.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 14,915 | 9.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 6,549 | 9.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 2,160 | 25.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 8,171 | 6.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 7,763 | 7.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 13,291 | 24.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 15,452 | 6.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.80% | 9,960 | 8.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 29,883 | 9.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 3,317 | 15.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 8,535 | 18.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 889 | 9.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,804 | 23.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 28,568 | 7.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 8,919 | 25.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.95% | 11,084 | 30.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 10,859 | 28.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 8,024 | 14.0% |