Russian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Russian
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Russian Single Female Poverty
19.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,545,833 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 19.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.4% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Russians and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Russians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Russians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Russians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Lithuanian (19.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Sri Lankan (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (19.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants from Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russian Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 39.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.0% | 91.7% |
| Mean | 13.3% | 31.0% |
| Median | 11.9% | 20.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 37.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 22.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 22.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 22.1% |
Correlation Details
| Russian Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 231,916,538 | 25.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 123,892,425 | 20.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 56,752,619 | 18.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 34,600,234 | 18.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 24,079,220 | 19.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 7,809,766 | 16.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.98% | 5,229,853 | 16.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 3,104,014 | 16.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,136,695 | 15.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 2,103,116 | 15.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 1,095,615 | 15.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30% | 1,198,033 | 14.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 612,087 | 15.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 673,524 | 11.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 568,642 | 18.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 340,608 | 14.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 416,886 | 11.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.07% | 268,648 | 15.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 102,400 | 14.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.90% | 177,240 | 9.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.39% | 122,684 | 16.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.79% | 72,941 | 32.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.39% | 51,320 | 13.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.87% | 22,666 | 8.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.25% | 12,161 | 35.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 11,250 | 48.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.04% | 29,532 | 31.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.56% | 1,011 | 49.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.93% | 13,967 | 13.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.68% | 1,550 | 25.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.99% | 14,399 | 17.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.37% | 9,439 | 13.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.15% | 4,250 | 35.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.64% | 275 | 64.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.81% | 3,701 | 55.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.22% | 1,073 | 44.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.02% | 329 | 66.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.32% | 1,039 | 40.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.60% | 83,069 | 18.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.02% | 172 | 33.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.61% | 2,289 | 30.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.18% | 1,204 | 45.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.47% | 2,530 | 15.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.90% | 842 | 20.8% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.42% | 1,543 | 100.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 291 | 30.8% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.16% | 178 | 100.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.28% | 666 | 73.7% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.07% | 402 | 73.7% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.79% | 95 | 33.3% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.78% | 90 | 33.3% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.19% | 712 | 64.3% |