Comanche Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Comanche Single Female Poverty
25.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,354,794 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 25.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.94% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Comanche and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Comanche influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Comanche simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Comanche Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.034% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 75.2% |
| Range | 20.5% | 67.8% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 34.6% |
| Median | 5.4% | 29.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 47.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 23.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 15.7% |
Correlation Details
| Comanche Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 107,751,222 | 23.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 1,075,168 | 25.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 154,237 | 29.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 51,940 | 31.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 34,830 | 36.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 12,157 | 47.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 159,423 | 30.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 34,914 | 29.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 6,471 | 47.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 25,692 | 27.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.11% | 1,654 | 75.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 3,707 | 70.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 4,966 | 34.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 8,033 | 20.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 2,994 | 49.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,723 | 24.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.98% | 2,520 | 51.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.49% | 3,230 | 43.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.83% | 2,563 | 33.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.52% | 4,867 | 19.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.99% | 1,438 | 28.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.26% | 1,377 | 50.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.27% | 1,341 | 7.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.87% | 2,974 | 22.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.46% | 1,065 | 23.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.49% | 288 | 16.0% |