French Canadian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
French Canadian
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
French Canadian Single Female Poverty
22.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 489,180,966 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523 and weighted average of 22.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.88% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of French Canadians and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of French Canadians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if French Canadians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to French Canadians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Malaysian (22.2%, a difference of 0.0%), French (22.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Vietnamese (22.0%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants from Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spaniards | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spanish | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
| French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
| French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
French Canadian Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French Canadian Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 57.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.9% | 98.9% |
| Mean | 17.7% | 35.0% |
| Median | 15.8% | 25.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.1% | 38.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 16.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 21.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 21.5% |
Correlation Details
| French Canadian Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 357,619,965 | 22.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 78,869,744 | 20.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 21,053,765 | 21.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 9,088,584 | 21.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 5,387,543 | 20.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 3,177,285 | 22.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 2,500,864 | 21.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 1,850,231 | 20.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.23% | 1,376,315 | 22.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 1,050,770 | 20.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.27% | 912,910 | 25.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 689,092 | 24.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 817,638 | 22.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 618,163 | 18.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 666,284 | 19.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.73% | 432,989 | 22.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 702,370 | 22.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.75% | 210,559 | 26.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.25% | 300,266 | 25.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.66% | 196,497 | 23.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.29% | 326,730 | 24.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.77% | 255,960 | 33.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.26% | 103,995 | 23.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.77% | 57,937 | 24.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.27% | 115,289 | 24.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.73% | 233,417 | 28.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.17% | 36,779 | 20.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.69% | 23,856 | 34.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.24% | 86,571 | 27.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.74% | 60,421 | 25.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.10% | 16,924 | 17.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.75% | 50,016 | 30.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.33% | 22,840 | 24.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.63% | 27,621 | 20.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.11% | 50,131 | 24.9% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.72% | 9,288 | 21.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 18,600 | 37.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.93% | 94,416 | 34.1% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.28% | 22,171 | 33.8% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.64% | 392 | 23.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.33% | 12,006 | 22.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.79% | 7,392 | 23.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.41% | 3,988 | 37.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.87% | 2,154 | 1.1% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 122 | 40.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.29% | 1,739 | 61.2% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.64% | 423 | 100.0% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.13% | 1,915 | 53.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.30% | 1,522 | 85.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.73% | 241 | 79.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 49 | 100.0% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.82% | 1,668 | 62.8% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.59% | 419 | 50.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 298 | 100.0% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.77% | 946 | 68.9% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.98% | 3,190 | 47.6% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.66% | 2,883 | 46.9% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.47% | 340 | 50.0% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.52% | 597 | 29.6% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.61% | 997 | 25.7% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.70% | 576 | 70.5% |
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.41% | 915 | 38.4% |
[ 57.0% - 57.5% ] 57.15% | 1,398 | 34.4% |