Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Dominica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,371,682 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Immigrants from Dominica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 69.5 Immigrants from Dominica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.7%), per capita income ($33,279 compared to $37,952, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $37,825, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $50,071, a difference of 4.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $83,311, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $50,301, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (24.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 30.0%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 111.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 95.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 65.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 15.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 65.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.3%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.0%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (87.7% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.070%), ged/equivalency (80.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.67%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.3%).