Iroquois vs Northern European Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Northern European
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Northern Europeans

Fair
Excellent
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,451
SOCIAL INDEX
82.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
71st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Northern European Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,960,769 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 16.0 Northern Europeans.
Iroquois Integration in Northern European Communities

Iroquois vs Northern European Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $107,870, a difference of 23.6%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $110,635, a difference of 22.2%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $47,698, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,678, a difference of 9.1%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,491, a difference of 11.2%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 12.8%).
Iroquois vs Northern European Income
Income MetricIroquoisNorthern European
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Exceptional
$47,698
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Exceptional
$110,635
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Exceptional
$90,446
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Exceptional
$48,887
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Exceptional
$58,588
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Excellent
$40,491
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Fair
$51,678
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Exceptional
$100,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Exceptional
$107,870
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Exceptional
$64,658
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
28.3%

Iroquois vs Northern European Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 37.9%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 37.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.0%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.4%).
Iroquois vs Northern European Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisNorthern European
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Poor
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.8%

Iroquois vs Northern European Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Iroquois vs Northern European Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisNorthern European
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Iroquois vs Northern European Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Iroquois vs Northern European Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisNorthern European
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Average
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Average
82.7%

Iroquois vs Northern European Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 25.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.95%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Iroquois vs Northern European Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisNorthern European
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Exceptional
48.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Excellent
30.6%

Iroquois vs Northern European Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.7%).
Iroquois vs Northern European Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisNorthern European
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.3%

Iroquois vs Northern European Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 40.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Iroquois vs Northern European Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisNorthern European
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
69.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
41.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Iroquois vs Northern European Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.2%).
Iroquois vs Northern European Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisNorthern European
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%