Iroquois vs Immigrants from Switzerland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,669,086 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Immigrants from Switzerland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 138.1 Immigrants from Switzerland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $54,866, a difference of 40.3%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $120,726, a difference of 33.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $115,934, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,528, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $43,996, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 39.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.2%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 33.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.79%), family households (62.2% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 93.4%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 91.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 42.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.4%).