Iroquois vs Inupiat Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,315,576 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Inupiat.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 20.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $55,935, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $61,061, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $84,619, a difference of 1.1%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $91,730, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $43,000, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 48.0%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.090%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 112.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 108.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 105.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 45.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 86.7%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 36.4%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 3.2%), currently married (44.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households (62.2% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 172.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (42.8% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 31.5%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.090%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 155.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and male disability (13.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.8%).