Iroquois vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,024,817 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 20.2 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $99,824, a difference of 14.4%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $102,368, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,457, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,230, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $46,296, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 29.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.45%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.2%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.0%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 47.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.40%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%).