Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,193,369 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.022. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 12.8 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $50,950, a difference of 34.6%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $62,057, a difference of 26.2%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $115,523, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $55,022, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $64,828, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 33.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.5%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 38.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.5%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.15, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 53.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 73.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.8%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.2%).