Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa

2.5%
59.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74106 59.0% 23.3% (+35.7)#41 18.1% (+41.0)#1,765
2. 74116 52.7% 23.3% (+29.4)#60 18.1% (+34.6)#2,278
3. 74126 52.4% 23.3% (+29.0)#61 18.1% (+34.3)#2,309
4. 74110 50.7% 23.3% (+27.4)#64 18.1% (+32.7)#2,448
5. 74115 47.9% 23.3% (+24.5)#78 18.1% (+29.8)#2,821
6. 74108 46.4% 23.3% (+23.0)#83 18.1% (+28.3)#2,997
7. 74130 44.3% 23.3% (+21.0)#96 18.1% (+26.3)#3,294
8. 74127 43.9% 23.3% (+20.6)#100 18.1% (+25.8)#3,349
9. 74146 43.3% 23.3% (+20.0)#102 18.1% (+25.3)#3,436
10. 74129 43.0% 23.3% (+19.7)#103 18.1% (+24.9)#3,481
11. 74107 38.3% 23.3% (+14.9)#130 18.1% (+20.2)#4,346
12. 74104 35.3% 23.3% (+12.0)#154 18.1% (+17.3)#4,991
13. 74136 33.1% 23.3% (+9.79)#176 18.1% (+15.1)#5,562
14. 74112 33.0% 23.3% (+9.61)#178 18.1% (+14.9)#5,597
15. 74128 32.8% 23.3% (+9.42)#184 18.1% (+14.7)#5,649
16. 74105 28.4% 23.3% (+5.09)#222 18.1% (+10.4)#6,842
17. 74131 22.6% 23.3% (-0.705)#284 18.1% (+4.58)#8,902
18. 74134 22.6% 23.3% (-0.714)#285 18.1% (+4.57)#8,904
19. 74135 21.3% 23.3% (-2.04)#306 18.1% (+3.24)#9,483
20. 74145 19.9% 23.3% (-3.44)#324 18.1% (+1.84)#10,102
21. 74119 15.7% 23.3% (-7.68)#362 18.1% (-2.40)#12,091
22. 74133 10.1% 23.3% (-13.2)#425 18.1% (-7.94)#15,333
23. 74137 10.0% 23.3% (-13.3)#427 18.1% (-8.06)#15,388
24. 74114 8.0% 23.3% (-15.4)#456 18.1% (-10.1)#16,775
25. 74132 2.5% 23.3% (-20.8)#507 18.1% (-15.5)#20,489

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
59.0%
#2
52.7%
#3
52.4%
#4
50.7%
#5
47.9%
#6
46.4%
#7
44.3%
#8
43.9%
#9
43.3%
#10
43.0%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa, OK?
74106 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa, OK with 59.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Tulsa is 31.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Oklahoma is 23.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.