Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa

100.0%
2.4%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74132 2.4% 9.5% (-7.10)#32 10.0% (-7.53)#1,656
2. 74120 4.5% 9.5% (-4.98)#87 10.0% (-5.41)#5,061
3. 74137 4.7% 9.5% (-4.86)#93 10.0% (-5.28)#5,324
4. 74145 5.7% 9.5% (-3.84)#127 10.0% (-4.27)#7,432
5. 74136 5.9% 9.5% (-3.64)#131 10.0% (-4.07)#7,871
6. 74114 6.1% 9.5% (-3.40)#146 10.0% (-3.83)#8,428
7. 74133 6.5% 9.5% (-3.01)#161 10.0% (-3.44)#9,205
8. 74135 6.5% 9.5% (-3.00)#163 10.0% (-3.43)#9,234
9. 74131 6.6% 9.5% (-2.96)#165 10.0% (-3.39)#9,308
10. 74105 7.6% 9.5% (-1.92)#212 10.0% (-2.35)#11,526
11. 74134 8.0% 9.5% (-1.54)#225 10.0% (-1.97)#12,276
12. 74130 8.1% 9.5% (-1.47)#231 10.0% (-1.89)#12,434
13. 74108 9.1% 9.5% (-0.396)#275 10.0% (-0.825)#14,431
14. 74128 9.3% 9.5% (-0.205)#283 10.0% (-0.634)#14,737
15. 74119 9.4% 9.5% (-0.092)#286 10.0% (-0.521)#14,942
16. 74116 10.3% 9.5% (+0.756)#319 10.0% (+0.326)#16,381
17. 74112 11.9% 9.5% (+2.34)#367 10.0% (+1.91)#18,640
18. 74127 12.4% 9.5% (+2.89)#389 10.0% (+2.46)#19,284
19. 74107 12.6% 9.5% (+3.11)#395 10.0% (+2.68)#19,557
20. 74126 13.3% 9.5% (+3.82)#414 10.0% (+3.40)#20,318
21. 74129 15.1% 9.5% (+5.62)#445 10.0% (+5.19)#21,877
22. 74115 16.8% 9.5% (+7.23)#481 10.0% (+6.80)#23,008
23. 74104 17.0% 9.5% (+7.47)#486 10.0% (+7.04)#23,166
24. 74146 17.0% 9.5% (+7.49)#487 10.0% (+7.06)#23,177
25. 74106 18.7% 9.5% (+9.21)#511 10.0% (+8.78)#24,087
26. 74110 24.2% 9.5% (+14.7)#555 10.0% (+14.3)#25,853
27. 74103 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#600 10.0% (+90.0)#28,217

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
2.4%
#2
4.5%
#3
4.7%
#4
5.7%
#5
5.9%
#6
6.1%
#7
6.5%
#8
6.5%
#9
6.6%
#10
7.6%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK with 2.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa is 9.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma is 9.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.