Zip Codes with the Highest Costs of Housing as Percentage of Income in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Housing Costs / Income
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Costs of Housing as Percentage of Income in Tulsa

0.0%
30.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Costs of Housing as Percentage of Income in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Costs of Housing as Percentage of Income in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Housing Costs / Income vs State vs National
1.7410425.9%18.1%(+7.88)#820.4%(+5.57)#2,424
2.7411924.9%18.1%(+6.84)#1520.4%(+4.54)#3,088
3.7414624.4%18.1%(+6.35)#1820.4%(+4.04)#3,410
4.7411024.3%18.1%(+6.24)#1920.4%(+3.94)#3,469
5.7410624.1%18.1%(+6.03)#2020.4%(+3.73)#3,636
6.7413622.9%18.1%(+4.83)#3120.4%(+2.53)#4,746
7.7412622.4%18.1%(+4.38)#3720.4%(+2.07)#5,223
8.7411522.4%18.1%(+4.34)#3920.4%(+2.04)#5,260
9.7414521.9%18.1%(+3.82)#4220.4%(+1.51)#5,897
10.7412921.8%18.1%(+3.76)#4420.4%(+1.45)#5,977
11.7412821.8%18.1%(+3.68)#4520.4%(+1.38)#6,084
12.7411221.2%18.1%(+3.12)#5420.4%(+0.813)#6,882
13.7412721.2%18.1%(+3.11)#5520.4%(+0.807)#6,889
14.7413020.7%18.1%(+2.59)#6120.4%(+0.285)#7,669
15.7410720.5%18.1%(+2.46)#6320.4%(+0.156)#7,874
16.7412020.3%18.1%(+2.24)#6520.4%(-0.062)#8,212
17.7410520.0%18.1%(+1.96)#7020.4%(-0.348)#8,744
18.7413419.1%18.1%(+1.04)#8320.4%(-1.26)#10,582
19.7413518.8%18.1%(+0.708)#9420.4%(-1.60)#11,305
20.7413218.5%18.1%(+0.458)#10120.4%(-1.85)#11,845
21.7413318.4%18.1%(+0.291)#10420.4%(-2.02)#12,240
22.7410818.2%18.1%(+0.132)#11320.4%(-2.17)#12,604
23.7411617.6%18.1%(-0.477)#14720.4%(-2.78)#14,112
24.7411417.0%18.1%(-1.06)#18420.4%(-3.36)#15,608
25.7410316.4%18.1%(-1.71)#21520.4%(-4.02)#17,387
26.7413116.2%18.1%(-1.90)#22320.4%(-4.20)#17,854
27.7413715.8%18.1%(-2.29)#24820.4%(-4.60)#18,898

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Costs of Housing as Percentage of Income in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Costs of Housing as Percentage of Income in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
25.9%
#2
24.9%
#3
24.4%
#4
24.3%
#5
24.1%
#6
22.9%
#7
22.4%
#8
22.4%
#9
21.9%
#10
21.8%
What zip code has the Highest Costs of Housing as Percentage of Income in Tulsa, OK?
74104 has the Highest Costs of Housing as Percentage of Income in Tulsa, OK with 25.9%.
What is the Average Housing Costs as Percentage of Income in Tulsa, OK?
Average Housing Costs as Percentage of Income in Tulsa is 20.8%.
What is the Average Housing Costs as Percentage of Income in Oklahoma?
Average Housing Costs as Percentage of Income in Oklahoma is 18.1%.
What is the Average Housing Costs as Percentage of Income in the United States?
Average Housing Costs as Percentage of Income in the United States is 20.4%.