Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa

60.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1.741376.2%20.6%(-14.4)#4816.9%(-10.7)#4,851
2.741327.3%20.6%(-13.4)#5816.9%(-9.65)#5,746
3.7411410.8%20.6%(-9.81)#11216.9%(-6.11)#8,774
4.7412011.4%20.6%(-9.22)#12216.9%(-5.51)#9,237
5.7413312.9%20.6%(-7.70)#14616.9%(-4.00)#10,280
6.7413416.3%20.6%(-4.29)#20116.9%(-0.587)#12,529
7.7413516.9%20.6%(-3.67)#20816.9%(+0.035)#12,920
8.7414517.8%20.6%(-2.77)#21816.9%(+0.930)#13,427
9.7411919.3%20.6%(-1.28)#24816.9%(+2.42)#14,196
10.7411225.3%20.6%(+4.67)#33516.9%(+8.37)#17,025
11.7410426.2%20.6%(+5.56)#35016.9%(+9.26)#17,386
12.7413626.9%20.6%(+6.31)#36116.9%(+10.0)#17,665
13.7410527.4%20.6%(+6.79)#36616.9%(+10.5)#17,828
14.7412827.4%20.6%(+6.82)#36716.9%(+10.5)#17,832
15.7413132.0%20.6%(+11.4)#40816.9%(+15.1)#19,313
16.7410733.7%20.6%(+13.1)#43416.9%(+16.8)#19,770
17.7411635.0%20.6%(+14.4)#44516.9%(+18.1)#20,089
18.7414636.0%20.6%(+15.4)#45516.9%(+19.1)#20,326
19.7413037.1%20.6%(+16.5)#46016.9%(+20.2)#20,521
20.7412938.5%20.6%(+17.9)#46916.9%(+21.6)#20,838
21.7411538.7%20.6%(+18.1)#47016.9%(+21.8)#20,867
22.7412741.5%20.6%(+20.9)#49116.9%(+24.6)#21,385
23.7411045.2%20.6%(+24.6)#50516.9%(+28.3)#21,909
24.7410847.4%20.6%(+26.8)#51416.9%(+30.5)#22,182
25.7412649.4%20.6%(+28.8)#52116.9%(+32.5)#22,391
26.7410350.0%20.6%(+29.4)#52216.9%(+33.1)#22,442
27.7410651.5%20.6%(+30.9)#53116.9%(+34.6)#22,608

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
6.2%
#2
7.3%
#3
10.8%
#4
11.4%
#5
12.9%
#6
16.3%
#7
16.9%
#8
17.8%
#9
19.3%
#10
25.3%
What zip code has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
74137 has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK with 6.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa is 27.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.