Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa

51.5%
6.2%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. 74137 6.2% 20.6% (-14.4)#48 16.9% (-10.7)#4,851
2. 74132 7.3% 20.6% (-13.4)#58 16.9% (-9.65)#5,746
3. 74114 10.8% 20.6% (-9.81)#112 16.9% (-6.11)#8,774
4. 74120 11.4% 20.6% (-9.22)#122 16.9% (-5.51)#9,237
5. 74133 12.9% 20.6% (-7.70)#146 16.9% (-4.00)#10,280
6. 74134 16.3% 20.6% (-4.29)#201 16.9% (-0.587)#12,529
7. 74135 16.9% 20.6% (-3.67)#208 16.9% (+0.035)#12,920
8. 74145 17.8% 20.6% (-2.77)#218 16.9% (+0.930)#13,427
9. 74119 19.3% 20.6% (-1.28)#248 16.9% (+2.42)#14,196
10. 74112 25.3% 20.6% (+4.67)#335 16.9% (+8.37)#17,025
11. 74104 26.2% 20.6% (+5.56)#350 16.9% (+9.26)#17,386
12. 74136 26.9% 20.6% (+6.31)#361 16.9% (+10.0)#17,665
13. 74105 27.4% 20.6% (+6.79)#366 16.9% (+10.5)#17,828
14. 74128 27.4% 20.6% (+6.82)#367 16.9% (+10.5)#17,832
15. 74131 32.0% 20.6% (+11.4)#408 16.9% (+15.1)#19,313
16. 74107 33.7% 20.6% (+13.1)#434 16.9% (+16.8)#19,770
17. 74116 35.0% 20.6% (+14.4)#445 16.9% (+18.1)#20,089
18. 74146 36.0% 20.6% (+15.4)#455 16.9% (+19.1)#20,326
19. 74130 37.1% 20.6% (+16.5)#460 16.9% (+20.2)#20,521
20. 74129 38.5% 20.6% (+17.9)#469 16.9% (+21.6)#20,838
21. 74115 38.7% 20.6% (+18.1)#470 16.9% (+21.8)#20,867
22. 74127 41.5% 20.6% (+20.9)#491 16.9% (+24.6)#21,385
23. 74110 45.2% 20.6% (+24.6)#505 16.9% (+28.3)#21,909
24. 74108 47.4% 20.6% (+26.8)#514 16.9% (+30.5)#22,182
25. 74126 49.4% 20.6% (+28.8)#521 16.9% (+32.5)#22,391
26. 74103 50.0% 20.6% (+29.4)#522 16.9% (+33.1)#22,442
27. 74106 51.5% 20.6% (+30.9)#531 16.9% (+34.6)#22,608

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
6.2%
#2
7.3%
#3
10.8%
#4
11.4%
#5
12.9%
#6
16.3%
#7
16.9%
#8
17.8%
#9
19.3%
#10
25.3%
What zip code has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
74137 has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK with 6.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa is 27.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.