Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa

40.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1.741327.9%16.5%(-8.63)#7413.7%(-5.83)#8,497
2.741377.9%16.5%(-8.62)#7513.7%(-5.82)#8,510
3.741148.4%16.5%(-8.10)#8413.7%(-5.30)#9,327
4.741339.6%16.5%(-6.94)#10513.7%(-4.14)#11,223
5.7413412.2%16.5%(-4.30)#16613.7%(-1.50)#15,095
6.7412013.3%16.5%(-3.22)#20013.7%(-0.424)#16,530
7.7413513.6%16.5%(-2.85)#21313.7%(-0.054)#17,016
8.7414513.9%16.5%(-2.57)#21913.7%(+0.229)#17,360
9.7413114.0%16.5%(-2.47)#22113.7%(+0.329)#17,491
10.7411916.6%16.5%(+0.068)#29213.7%(+2.87)#20,286
11.7410517.1%16.5%(+0.643)#31313.7%(+3.44)#20,870
12.7411220.0%16.5%(+3.46)#39513.7%(+6.26)#23,201
13.7410320.4%16.5%(+3.86)#40613.7%(+6.66)#23,477
14.7413620.5%16.5%(+4.04)#40913.7%(+6.84)#23,586
15.7412722.6%16.5%(+6.12)#45713.7%(+8.92)#24,896
16.7412923.7%16.5%(+7.18)#47413.7%(+9.98)#25,411
17.7411623.9%16.5%(+7.41)#47913.7%(+10.2)#25,526
18.7412824.1%16.5%(+7.57)#48113.7%(+10.4)#25,612
19.7410725.9%16.5%(+9.39)#51513.7%(+12.2)#26,383
20.7410826.3%16.5%(+9.82)#52013.7%(+12.6)#26,531
21.7410427.6%16.5%(+11.1)#54213.7%(+13.9)#26,998
22.7414628.4%16.5%(+11.9)#55413.7%(+14.7)#27,246
23.7411528.7%16.5%(+12.2)#56013.7%(+15.0)#27,317
24.7413030.7%16.5%(+14.2)#58313.7%(+17.0)#27,856
25.7412633.7%16.5%(+17.2)#59613.7%(+20.0)#28,456
26.7410634.4%16.5%(+17.9)#60013.7%(+20.7)#28,568
27.7411035.4%16.5%(+18.9)#60613.7%(+21.7)#28,741

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
7.9%
#2
7.9%
#3
8.4%
#4
9.6%
#5
12.2%
#6
13.3%
#7
13.6%
#8
13.9%
#9
14.0%
#10
16.6%
What zip code has the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK with 7.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Females in Tulsa is 19.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Females in Oklahoma is 16.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.