Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa

35.4%
7.9%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74132 7.9% 16.5% (-8.63)#74 13.7% (-5.83)#8,497
2. 74137 7.9% 16.5% (-8.62)#75 13.7% (-5.82)#8,510
3. 74114 8.4% 16.5% (-8.10)#84 13.7% (-5.30)#9,327
4. 74133 9.6% 16.5% (-6.94)#105 13.7% (-4.14)#11,223
5. 74134 12.2% 16.5% (-4.30)#166 13.7% (-1.50)#15,095
6. 74120 13.3% 16.5% (-3.22)#200 13.7% (-0.424)#16,530
7. 74135 13.6% 16.5% (-2.85)#213 13.7% (-0.054)#17,016
8. 74145 13.9% 16.5% (-2.57)#219 13.7% (+0.229)#17,360
9. 74131 14.0% 16.5% (-2.47)#221 13.7% (+0.329)#17,491
10. 74119 16.6% 16.5% (+0.068)#292 13.7% (+2.87)#20,286
11. 74105 17.1% 16.5% (+0.643)#313 13.7% (+3.44)#20,870
12. 74112 20.0% 16.5% (+3.46)#395 13.7% (+6.26)#23,201
13. 74103 20.4% 16.5% (+3.86)#406 13.7% (+6.66)#23,477
14. 74136 20.5% 16.5% (+4.04)#409 13.7% (+6.84)#23,586
15. 74127 22.6% 16.5% (+6.12)#457 13.7% (+8.92)#24,896
16. 74129 23.7% 16.5% (+7.18)#474 13.7% (+9.98)#25,411
17. 74116 23.9% 16.5% (+7.41)#479 13.7% (+10.2)#25,526
18. 74128 24.1% 16.5% (+7.57)#481 13.7% (+10.4)#25,612
19. 74107 25.9% 16.5% (+9.39)#515 13.7% (+12.2)#26,383
20. 74108 26.3% 16.5% (+9.82)#520 13.7% (+12.6)#26,531
21. 74104 27.6% 16.5% (+11.1)#542 13.7% (+13.9)#26,998
22. 74146 28.4% 16.5% (+11.9)#554 13.7% (+14.7)#27,246
23. 74115 28.7% 16.5% (+12.2)#560 13.7% (+15.0)#27,317
24. 74130 30.7% 16.5% (+14.2)#583 13.7% (+17.0)#27,856
25. 74126 33.7% 16.5% (+17.2)#596 13.7% (+20.0)#28,456
26. 74106 34.4% 16.5% (+17.9)#600 13.7% (+20.7)#28,568
27. 74110 35.4% 16.5% (+18.9)#606 13.7% (+21.7)#28,741

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
7.9%
#2
7.9%
#3
8.4%
#4
9.6%
#5
12.2%
#6
13.3%
#7
13.6%
#8
13.9%
#9
14.0%
#10
16.6%
What zip code has the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Lowest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK with 7.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Females in Tulsa is 19.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Females in Oklahoma is 16.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.