Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa

24.4%
54.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. 74106 54.9% 36.7% (+18.2)#9 38.5% (+16.4)#802
2. 74115 52.2% 36.7% (+15.5)#11 38.5% (+13.7)#1,170
3. 74135 52.0% 36.7% (+15.3)#12 38.5% (+13.5)#1,207
4. 74127 48.2% 36.7% (+11.5)#16 38.5% (+9.70)#1,923
5. 74133 48.1% 36.7% (+11.4)#17 38.5% (+9.60)#1,936
6. 74134 43.5% 36.7% (+6.80)#21 38.5% (+5.00)#3,136
7. 74136 41.5% 36.7% (+4.80)#25 38.5% (+3.00)#3,698
8. 74105 41.4% 36.7% (+4.70)#26 38.5% (+2.90)#3,729
9. 74110 40.2% 36.7% (+3.50)#30 38.5% (+1.70)#4,154
10. 74137 39.8% 36.7% (+3.10)#32 38.5% (+1.30)#4,260
11. 74129 38.4% 36.7% (+1.70)#34 38.5% (-0.100)#4,726
12. 74112 37.7% 36.7% (+1.000)#35 38.5% (-0.800)#4,912
13. 74146 37.1% 36.7% (+0.400)#36 38.5% (-1.40)#5,090
14. 74128 36.1% 36.7% (-0.600)#39 38.5% (-2.40)#5,370
15. 74126 32.7% 36.7% (-4.00)#43 38.5% (-5.80)#6,295
16. 74107 30.7% 36.7% (-6.00)#46 38.5% (-7.80)#6,729
17. 74145 30.5% 36.7% (-6.20)#47 38.5% (-8.00)#6,780
18. 74104 24.4% 36.7% (-12.3)#52 38.5% (-14.1)#7,659

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
54.9%
#2
52.2%
#3
52.0%
#4
48.2%
#5
48.1%
#6
43.5%
#7
41.5%
#8
41.4%
#9
40.2%
#10
39.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa, OK?
74106 has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa, OK with 54.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Tulsa is 40.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Oklahoma is 36.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.