Zip Codes with the Lowest Male Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Male Poverty Level in Tulsa

32.2%
5.9%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Male Poverty Level in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Male Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74132 5.9% 13.9% (-8.01)#73 11.3% (-5.42)#7,779
2. 74137 6.4% 13.9% (-7.53)#85 11.3% (-4.94)#8,666
3. 74114 7.6% 13.9% (-6.38)#116 11.3% (-3.78)#10,793
4. 74133 8.0% 13.9% (-5.95)#129 11.3% (-3.36)#11,524
5. 74134 9.9% 13.9% (-4.01)#171 11.3% (-1.41)#14,879
6. 74131 10.7% 13.9% (-3.24)#194 11.3% (-0.647)#16,073
7. 74120 11.0% 13.9% (-2.94)#206 11.3% (-0.348)#16,557
8. 74135 11.4% 13.9% (-2.52)#221 11.3% (+0.073)#17,152
9. 74145 11.5% 13.9% (-2.43)#226 11.3% (+0.161)#17,268
10. 74105 13.9% 13.9% (-0.004)#300 11.3% (+2.59)#20,272
11. 74112 14.9% 13.9% (+0.916)#332 11.3% (+3.51)#21,241
12. 74119 17.9% 13.9% (+3.99)#432 11.3% (+6.59)#23,820
13. 74107 18.1% 13.9% (+4.14)#436 11.3% (+6.73)#23,913
14. 74136 18.3% 13.9% (+4.37)#450 11.3% (+6.97)#24,073
15. 74116 19.2% 13.9% (+5.28)#478 11.3% (+7.88)#24,677
16. 74128 20.6% 13.9% (+6.68)#506 11.3% (+9.28)#25,401
17. 74127 20.7% 13.9% (+6.79)#507 11.3% (+9.38)#25,445
18. 74108 21.9% 13.9% (+7.98)#520 11.3% (+10.6)#25,975
19. 74129 22.0% 13.9% (+8.05)#523 11.3% (+10.6)#26,010
20. 74146 22.3% 13.9% (+8.35)#525 11.3% (+10.9)#26,133
21. 74103 22.4% 13.9% (+8.51)#530 11.3% (+11.1)#26,204
22. 74130 23.1% 13.9% (+9.13)#539 11.3% (+11.7)#26,446
23. 74104 23.8% 13.9% (+9.83)#550 11.3% (+12.4)#26,670
24. 74115 25.3% 13.9% (+11.3)#563 11.3% (+13.9)#27,124
25. 74110 30.3% 13.9% (+16.4)#596 11.3% (+19.0)#28,266
26. 74106 31.1% 13.9% (+17.2)#599 11.3% (+19.8)#28,400
27. 74126 32.2% 13.9% (+18.2)#602 11.3% (+20.8)#28,552

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Male Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Male Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
5.9%
#2
6.4%
#3
7.6%
#4
8.0%
#5
9.9%
#6
10.7%
#7
11.0%
#8
11.4%
#9
11.5%
#10
13.9%
What zip code has the Lowest Male Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Lowest Male Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK with 5.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Males in Tulsa is 16.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Males in Oklahoma is 13.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Males in the United States is 11.3%.