Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Management
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa

0.0%
20.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.7411417.1%10.1%(+6.95)#7711.0%(+6.07)#4,963
2.7413715.8%10.1%(+5.69)#9511.0%(+4.81)#6,094
3.7410315.1%10.1%(+4.93)#10911.0%(+4.05)#6,949
4.7412014.2%10.1%(+4.01)#13711.0%(+3.14)#8,175
5.7413213.1%10.1%(+3.00)#17011.0%(+2.12)#9,714
6.7410513.1%10.1%(+2.98)#17111.0%(+2.10)#9,755
7.7413511.9%10.1%(+1.80)#21411.0%(+0.920)#11,895
8.7413311.7%10.1%(+1.58)#22511.0%(+0.698)#12,327
9.7413410.7%10.1%(+0.526)#28011.0%(-0.353)#14,660
10.741049.5%10.1%(-0.621)#35411.0%(-1.50)#17,435
11.741319.4%10.1%(-0.775)#36111.0%(-1.65)#17,846
12.741368.9%10.1%(-1.26)#38811.0%(-2.14)#19,020
13.741088.3%10.1%(-1.85)#42211.0%(-2.73)#20,506
14.741078.3%10.1%(-1.88)#42411.0%(-2.76)#20,585
15.741278.1%10.1%(-2.05)#43611.0%(-2.92)#20,983
16.741457.9%10.1%(-2.26)#44411.0%(-3.14)#21,501
17.741067.9%10.1%(-2.27)#44611.0%(-3.15)#21,513
18.741127.8%10.1%(-2.35)#44811.0%(-3.23)#21,734
19.741197.6%10.1%(-2.52)#45511.0%(-3.40)#22,141
20.741166.4%10.1%(-3.79)#52711.0%(-4.67)#24,851
21.741285.8%10.1%(-4.32)#54511.0%(-5.20)#25,802
22.741294.3%10.1%(-5.85)#59011.0%(-6.73)#28,012
23.741464.2%10.1%(-5.94)#59111.0%(-6.81)#28,105
24.741103.7%10.1%(-6.42)#60011.0%(-7.30)#28,578
25.741153.6%10.1%(-6.56)#60311.0%(-7.44)#28,717
26.741263.3%10.1%(-6.83)#60811.0%(-7.71)#28,944
27.741302.7%10.1%(-7.45)#61511.0%(-8.33)#29,391
28.741710.72%10.1%(-9.42)#62511.0%(-10.3)#30,234

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
17.1%
#2
15.8%
#3
15.1%
#4
14.2%
#5
13.1%
#6
13.1%
#7
11.9%
#8
11.7%
#9
10.7%
#10
9.5%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa, OK?
74114 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa, OK with 17.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Tulsa is 9.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Oklahoma is 10.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States is 11.0%.