Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Family Income | $200k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa

0.70%
31.1%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Families with Income > $200k vs State vs National
1. 74114 31.1% 8.6% (+22.5)#8 14.8% (+16.3)#2,353
2. 74137 30.7% 8.6% (+22.1)#9 14.8% (+15.9)#2,418
3. 74103 27.8% 8.6% (+19.2)#13 14.8% (+13.0)#2,897
4. 74105 27.0% 8.6% (+18.4)#14 14.8% (+12.2)#3,043
5. 74120 21.9% 8.6% (+13.3)#23 14.8% (+7.10)#4,245
6. 74132 19.5% 8.6% (+10.9)#27 14.8% (+4.70)#4,977
7. 74133 17.8% 8.6% (+9.20)#32 14.8% (+3.00)#5,632
8. 74135 14.2% 8.6% (+5.60)#51 14.8% (-0.600)#7,435
9. 74136 11.8% 8.6% (+3.20)#77 14.8% (-3.00)#9,118
10. 74134 10.3% 8.6% (+1.70)#96 14.8% (-4.50)#10,492
11. 74119 10.1% 8.6% (+1.50)#98 14.8% (-4.70)#10,734
12. 74131 8.3% 8.6% (-0.300)#138 14.8% (-6.50)#12,846
13. 74104 7.8% 8.6% (-0.800)#153 14.8% (-7.00)#13,468
14. 74108 4.7% 8.6% (-3.90)#289 14.8% (-10.1)#19,041
15. 74145 4.0% 8.6% (-4.60)#327 14.8% (-10.8)#20,421
16. 74116 3.7% 8.6% (-4.90)#349 14.8% (-11.1)#21,136
17. 74127 3.3% 8.6% (-5.30)#377 14.8% (-11.5)#21,878
18. 74112 3.0% 8.6% (-5.60)#400 14.8% (-11.8)#22,472
19. 74129 2.5% 8.6% (-6.10)#427 14.8% (-12.3)#23,500
20. 74107 2.4% 8.6% (-6.20)#432 14.8% (-12.4)#23,709
21. 74115 1.7% 8.6% (-6.90)#478 14.8% (-13.1)#24,978
22. 74106 1.7% 8.6% (-6.90)#479 14.8% (-13.1)#24,983
23. 74130 1.3% 8.6% (-7.30)#501 14.8% (-13.5)#25,692
24. 74146 1.1% 8.6% (-7.50)#509 14.8% (-13.7)#25,926
25. 74126 1.1% 8.6% (-7.50)#510 14.8% (-13.7)#25,933
26. 74110 0.70% 8.6% (-7.90)#529 14.8% (-14.1)#26,470
27. 74128 0.70% 8.6% (-7.90)#530 14.8% (-14.1)#26,471

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
31.1%
#2
30.7%
#3
27.8%
#4
27.0%
#5
21.9%
#6
19.5%
#7
17.8%
#8
14.2%
#9
11.8%
#10
10.3%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK?
74114 has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK with 31.1%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa is 11.4%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in Oklahoma is 8.6%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $200,000 in the United States is 14.8%.