Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa

52.4%
8.2%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74137 8.2% 20.7% (-12.5)#72 16.9% (-8.70)#7,144
2. 74132 8.5% 20.7% (-12.2)#81 16.9% (-8.40)#7,417
3. 74119 10.7% 20.7% (-10.0)#106 16.9% (-6.24)#9,354
4. 74133 11.7% 20.7% (-9.01)#124 16.9% (-5.22)#10,207
5. 74114 11.8% 20.7% (-8.96)#125 16.9% (-5.18)#10,238
6. 74120 12.0% 20.7% (-8.71)#131 16.9% (-4.93)#10,461
7. 74134 15.7% 20.7% (-5.04)#181 16.9% (-1.26)#13,186
8. 74135 15.8% 20.7% (-4.92)#183 16.9% (-1.14)#13,267
9. 74145 18.8% 20.7% (-1.90)#241 16.9% (+1.88)#15,263
10. 74105 25.5% 20.7% (+4.80)#358 16.9% (+8.58)#18,711
11. 74112 26.8% 20.7% (+6.13)#380 16.9% (+9.91)#19,294
12. 74136 27.1% 20.7% (+6.43)#384 16.9% (+10.2)#19,425
13. 74104 28.4% 20.7% (+7.67)#397 16.9% (+11.4)#19,900
14. 74128 29.7% 20.7% (+9.00)#419 16.9% (+12.8)#20,369
15. 74131 35.6% 20.7% (+14.9)#473 16.9% (+18.7)#22,004
16. 74146 36.0% 20.7% (+15.3)#479 16.9% (+19.0)#22,082
17. 74107 37.1% 20.7% (+16.4)#490 16.9% (+20.2)#22,332
18. 74129 37.3% 20.7% (+16.6)#494 16.9% (+20.4)#22,381
19. 74116 37.6% 20.7% (+16.9)#495 16.9% (+20.7)#22,448
20. 74115 38.4% 20.7% (+17.7)#500 16.9% (+21.5)#22,596
21. 74127 38.8% 20.7% (+18.1)#505 16.9% (+21.9)#22,676
22. 74103 41.2% 20.7% (+20.5)#527 16.9% (+24.2)#23,102
23. 74108 42.5% 20.7% (+21.8)#530 16.9% (+25.6)#23,286
24. 74110 43.0% 20.7% (+22.3)#532 16.9% (+26.1)#23,356
25. 74130 46.3% 20.7% (+25.6)#544 16.9% (+29.4)#23,822
26. 74126 48.3% 20.7% (+27.6)#549 16.9% (+31.4)#24,055
27. 74106 52.4% 20.7% (+31.7)#556 16.9% (+35.5)#24,454

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
8.2%
#2
8.5%
#3
10.7%
#4
11.7%
#5
11.8%
#6
12.0%
#7
15.7%
#8
15.8%
#9
18.8%
#10
25.5%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
74137 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK with 8.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa is 27.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.