Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa

39.5%
1.8%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74137 1.8% 15.8% (-13.9)#5 12.4% (-10.6)#401
2. 74104 1.9% 15.8% (-13.9)#6 12.4% (-10.6)#407
3. 74146 6.0% 15.8% (-9.78)#32 12.4% (-6.45)#2,734
4. 74133 7.5% 15.8% (-8.25)#45 12.4% (-4.92)#3,641
5. 74145 9.5% 15.8% (-6.27)#75 12.4% (-2.94)#4,819
6. 74135 12.6% 15.8% (-3.17)#113 12.4% (+0.165)#6,565
7. 74128 14.6% 15.8% (-1.12)#135 12.4% (+2.21)#7,526
8. 74119 14.7% 15.8% (-1.10)#136 12.4% (+2.23)#7,535
9. 74127 14.7% 15.8% (-1.04)#137 12.4% (+2.30)#7,567
10. 74129 15.2% 15.8% (-0.605)#143 12.4% (+2.73)#7,748
11. 74130 16.5% 15.8% (+0.688)#160 12.4% (+4.02)#8,276
12. 74110 17.9% 15.8% (+2.16)#185 12.4% (+5.50)#8,870
13. 74136 18.6% 15.8% (+2.85)#199 12.4% (+6.18)#9,143
14. 74108 19.9% 15.8% (+4.12)#207 12.4% (+7.45)#9,564
15. 74114 21.2% 15.8% (+5.43)#227 12.4% (+8.76)#10,036
16. 74134 22.4% 15.8% (+6.59)#238 12.4% (+9.92)#10,377
17. 74115 23.5% 15.8% (+7.71)#249 12.4% (+11.0)#10,692
18. 74112 24.3% 15.8% (+8.56)#259 12.4% (+11.9)#10,907
19. 74126 27.0% 15.8% (+11.2)#286 12.4% (+14.5)#11,553
20. 74105 27.4% 15.8% (+11.6)#289 12.4% (+15.0)#11,656
21. 74107 28.5% 15.8% (+12.7)#299 12.4% (+16.1)#11,865
22. 74106 30.9% 15.8% (+15.1)#309 12.4% (+18.5)#12,309
23. 74116 39.5% 15.8% (+23.8)#344 12.4% (+27.1)#13,415

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
0.0%
#4
1.8%
#5
1.9%
#6
6.0%
#7
7.5%
#8
9.5%
#9
12.6%
#10
14.6%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK?
74137 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK with 1.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa is 16.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma is 15.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States is 12.4%.