Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa

3.4%
39.7%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74115 39.7% 18.6% (+21.1)#63 14.5% (+25.2)#2,753
2. 74106 39.3% 18.6% (+20.7)#66 14.5% (+24.8)#2,794
3. 74116 37.3% 18.6% (+18.7)#78 14.5% (+22.8)#3,120
4. 74110 34.0% 18.6% (+15.4)#93 14.5% (+19.5)#3,738
5. 74131 29.2% 18.6% (+10.6)#144 14.5% (+14.7)#4,945
6. 74136 28.8% 18.6% (+10.2)#150 14.5% (+14.3)#5,079
7. 74146 28.5% 18.6% (+9.94)#156 14.5% (+14.0)#5,190
8. 74129 28.4% 18.6% (+9.77)#159 14.5% (+13.9)#5,240
9. 74107 27.5% 18.6% (+8.95)#174 14.5% (+13.1)#5,498
10. 74128 27.4% 18.6% (+8.84)#175 14.5% (+12.9)#5,533
11. 74112 25.1% 18.6% (+6.54)#201 14.5% (+10.6)#6,319
12. 74127 24.1% 18.6% (+5.55)#220 14.5% (+9.65)#6,754
13. 74126 23.9% 18.6% (+5.30)#224 14.5% (+9.40)#6,848
14. 74130 23.3% 18.6% (+4.66)#239 14.5% (+8.76)#7,127
15. 74108 23.2% 18.6% (+4.64)#240 14.5% (+8.74)#7,135
16. 74134 21.1% 18.6% (+2.49)#270 14.5% (+6.59)#8,150
17. 74145 16.3% 18.6% (-2.28)#338 14.5% (+1.82)#11,103
18. 74105 14.1% 18.6% (-4.47)#363 14.5% (-0.365)#12,641
19. 74120 13.4% 18.6% (-5.19)#380 14.5% (-1.09)#13,174
20. 74135 12.3% 18.6% (-6.26)#399 14.5% (-2.16)#14,009
21. 74133 12.0% 18.6% (-6.64)#403 14.5% (-2.53)#14,304
22. 74119 10.6% 18.6% (-7.99)#423 14.5% (-3.89)#15,479
23. 74104 10.4% 18.6% (-8.20)#426 14.5% (-4.09)#15,653
24. 74132 10.1% 18.6% (-8.49)#432 14.5% (-4.39)#15,894
25. 74137 8.4% 18.6% (-10.2)#456 14.5% (-6.06)#17,437
26. 74103 5.7% 18.6% (-12.9)#488 14.5% (-8.78)#19,941
27. 74114 3.4% 18.6% (-15.2)#513 14.5% (-11.1)#21,904

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
39.7%
#2
39.3%
#3
37.3%
#4
34.0%
#5
29.2%
#6
28.8%
#7
28.5%
#8
28.4%
#9
27.5%
#10
27.4%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK?
74115 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK with 39.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa is 21.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Oklahoma is 18.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.