Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa

28.8%
3.7%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74137 3.7% 11.0% (-7.29)#48 8.8% (-5.06)#5,766
2. 74114 4.4% 11.0% (-6.56)#63 8.8% (-4.34)#7,314
3. 74132 4.7% 11.0% (-6.35)#67 8.8% (-4.12)#7,786
4. 74119 5.5% 11.0% (-5.53)#91 8.8% (-3.30)#9,662
5. 74120 5.9% 11.0% (-5.10)#111 8.8% (-2.88)#10,588
6. 74133 6.0% 11.0% (-4.96)#116 8.8% (-2.73)#10,897
7. 74131 7.1% 11.0% (-3.95)#146 8.8% (-1.72)#12,876
8. 74134 7.9% 11.0% (-3.06)#177 8.8% (-0.833)#14,430
9. 74135 8.9% 11.0% (-2.07)#216 8.8% (+0.162)#16,117
10. 74104 9.8% 11.0% (-1.22)#253 8.8% (+1.01)#17,344
11. 74145 10.9% 11.0% (-0.154)#290 8.8% (+2.07)#18,710
12. 74105 12.4% 11.0% (+1.43)#339 8.8% (+3.66)#20,442
13. 74112 12.6% 11.0% (+1.59)#343 8.8% (+3.82)#20,608
14. 74136 15.0% 11.0% (+4.03)#426 8.8% (+6.26)#22,651
15. 74128 16.8% 11.0% (+5.75)#462 8.8% (+7.98)#23,703
16. 74129 18.8% 11.0% (+7.83)#506 8.8% (+10.1)#24,740
17. 74116 19.0% 11.0% (+7.99)#512 8.8% (+10.2)#24,803
18. 74127 19.1% 11.0% (+8.06)#513 8.8% (+10.3)#24,840
19. 74107 19.1% 11.0% (+8.07)#514 8.8% (+10.3)#24,846
20. 74130 19.7% 11.0% (+8.64)#521 8.8% (+10.9)#25,049
21. 74108 19.7% 11.0% (+8.65)#523 8.8% (+10.9)#25,053
22. 74115 21.6% 11.0% (+10.6)#543 8.8% (+12.8)#25,663
23. 74146 22.6% 11.0% (+11.6)#550 8.8% (+13.8)#25,950
24. 74126 26.2% 11.0% (+15.2)#573 8.8% (+17.4)#26,707
25. 74106 28.4% 11.0% (+17.4)#580 8.8% (+19.6)#26,995
26. 74110 28.8% 11.0% (+17.8)#585 8.8% (+20.0)#27,052

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
3.7%
#2
4.4%
#3
4.7%
#4
5.5%
#5
5.9%
#6
6.0%
#7
7.1%
#8
7.9%
#9
8.9%
#10
9.8%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK?
74137 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK with 3.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa is 13.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma is 11.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.