Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 18-24
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa

12.5%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74103 100.0% 26.9% (+73.1)#1 21.6% (+78.4)#48
2. 74104 67.8% 26.9% (+40.9)#21 21.6% (+46.2)#1,293
3. 74135 44.7% 26.9% (+17.8)#82 21.6% (+23.1)#3,208
4. 74126 41.6% 26.9% (+14.7)#90 21.6% (+20.0)#3,683
5. 74105 41.3% 26.9% (+14.4)#91 21.6% (+19.7)#3,740
6. 74119 38.8% 26.9% (+11.9)#102 21.6% (+17.2)#4,157
7. 74110 38.5% 26.9% (+11.6)#105 21.6% (+16.9)#4,202
8. 74107 33.9% 26.9% (+7.01)#127 21.6% (+12.3)#5,209
9. 74108 33.1% 26.9% (+6.22)#133 21.6% (+11.5)#5,458
10. 74130 30.8% 26.9% (+3.86)#154 21.6% (+9.17)#6,011
11. 74112 30.6% 26.9% (+3.67)#156 21.6% (+8.98)#6,078
12. 74114 30.3% 26.9% (+3.42)#158 21.6% (+8.73)#6,146
13. 74106 30.3% 26.9% (+3.41)#159 21.6% (+8.72)#6,148
14. 74136 29.3% 26.9% (+2.34)#170 21.6% (+7.66)#6,492
15. 74128 29.2% 26.9% (+2.34)#171 21.6% (+7.65)#6,494
16. 74120 28.8% 26.9% (+1.84)#177 21.6% (+7.16)#6,648
17. 74127 28.6% 26.9% (+1.68)#181 21.6% (+7.00)#6,693
18. 74146 27.7% 26.9% (+0.777)#196 21.6% (+6.09)#7,023
19. 74145 24.4% 26.9% (-2.49)#238 21.6% (+2.83)#8,220
20. 74115 21.2% 26.9% (-5.71)#271 21.6% (-0.398)#9,620
21. 74137 19.7% 26.9% (-7.18)#292 21.6% (-1.86)#10,326
22. 74134 19.4% 26.9% (-7.49)#300 21.6% (-2.18)#10,475
23. 74132 19.4% 26.9% (-7.55)#301 21.6% (-2.23)#10,497
24. 74129 18.1% 26.9% (-8.84)#321 21.6% (-3.52)#11,189
25. 74116 12.9% 26.9% (-14.0)#396 21.6% (-8.67)#14,107
26. 74133 12.5% 26.9% (-14.4)#401 21.6% (-9.10)#14,321

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
100.0%
#2
67.8%
#3
44.7%
#4
41.6%
#5
41.3%
#6
38.8%
#7
38.5%
#8
33.9%
#9
33.1%
#10
30.8%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa is 29.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Oklahoma is 26.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States is 21.6%.