Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 18-24
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1.74103100.0%26.9%(+73.1)#121.6%(+78.4)#48
2.7410467.8%26.9%(+40.9)#2121.6%(+46.2)#1,293
3.7413544.7%26.9%(+17.8)#8221.6%(+23.1)#3,208
4.7412641.6%26.9%(+14.7)#9021.6%(+20.0)#3,683
5.7410541.3%26.9%(+14.4)#9121.6%(+19.7)#3,740
6.7411938.8%26.9%(+11.9)#10221.6%(+17.2)#4,157
7.7411038.5%26.9%(+11.6)#10521.6%(+16.9)#4,202
8.7410733.9%26.9%(+7.01)#12721.6%(+12.3)#5,209
9.7410833.1%26.9%(+6.22)#13321.6%(+11.5)#5,458
10.7413030.8%26.9%(+3.86)#15421.6%(+9.17)#6,011
11.7411230.6%26.9%(+3.67)#15621.6%(+8.98)#6,078
12.7411430.3%26.9%(+3.42)#15821.6%(+8.73)#6,146
13.7410630.3%26.9%(+3.41)#15921.6%(+8.72)#6,148
14.7413629.3%26.9%(+2.34)#17021.6%(+7.66)#6,492
15.7412829.2%26.9%(+2.34)#17121.6%(+7.65)#6,494
16.7412028.8%26.9%(+1.84)#17721.6%(+7.16)#6,648
17.7412728.6%26.9%(+1.68)#18121.6%(+7.00)#6,693
18.7414627.7%26.9%(+0.777)#19621.6%(+6.09)#7,023
19.7414524.4%26.9%(-2.49)#23821.6%(+2.83)#8,220
20.7411521.2%26.9%(-5.71)#27121.6%(-0.398)#9,620
21.7413719.7%26.9%(-7.18)#29221.6%(-1.86)#10,326
22.7413419.4%26.9%(-7.49)#30021.6%(-2.18)#10,475
23.7413219.4%26.9%(-7.55)#30121.6%(-2.23)#10,497
24.7412918.1%26.9%(-8.84)#32121.6%(-3.52)#11,189
25.7411612.9%26.9%(-14.0)#39621.6%(-8.67)#14,107
26.7413312.5%26.9%(-14.4)#40121.6%(-9.10)#14,321

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
100.0%
#2
67.8%
#3
44.7%
#4
41.6%
#5
41.3%
#6
38.8%
#7
38.5%
#8
33.9%
#9
33.1%
#10
30.8%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Tulsa is 29.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Oklahoma is 26.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States is 21.6%.