Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Family Income | $100k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa

10.8%
65.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Families with Income > $100k vs State vs National
1. 74137 65.0% 36.7% (+28.3)#17 46.1% (+18.9)#3,741
2. 74114 60.3% 36.7% (+23.6)#26 46.1% (+14.2)#5,048
3. 74103 58.4% 36.7% (+21.7)#29 46.1% (+12.3)#5,656
4. 74119 55.9% 36.7% (+19.2)#34 46.1% (+9.80)#6,484
5. 74105 54.2% 36.7% (+17.5)#44 46.1% (+8.10)#7,096
6. 74120 54.1% 36.7% (+17.4)#45 46.1% (+8.00)#7,135
7. 74133 50.7% 36.7% (+14.0)#70 46.1% (+4.60)#8,521
8. 74135 50.4% 36.7% (+13.7)#71 46.1% (+4.30)#8,652
9. 74132 50.0% 36.7% (+13.3)#73 46.1% (+3.90)#8,810
10. 74131 48.4% 36.7% (+11.7)#80 46.1% (+2.30)#9,575
11. 74134 43.8% 36.7% (+7.10)#118 46.1% (-2.30)#12,011
12. 74136 39.1% 36.7% (+2.40)#172 46.1% (-7.00)#14,997
13. 74104 36.9% 36.7% (+0.200)#207 46.1% (-9.20)#16,578
14. 74145 32.9% 36.7% (-3.80)#249 46.1% (-13.2)#19,366
15. 74108 28.8% 36.7% (-7.90)#319 46.1% (-17.3)#22,254
16. 74112 28.2% 36.7% (-8.50)#334 46.1% (-17.9)#22,634
17. 74107 23.0% 36.7% (-13.7)#444 46.1% (-23.1)#25,801
18. 74127 22.7% 36.7% (-14.0)#452 46.1% (-23.4)#25,954
19. 74129 22.0% 36.7% (-14.7)#465 46.1% (-24.1)#26,296
20. 74116 19.6% 36.7% (-17.1)#507 46.1% (-26.5)#27,429
21. 74130 16.6% 36.7% (-20.1)#559 46.1% (-29.5)#28,614
22. 74106 16.4% 36.7% (-20.3)#564 46.1% (-29.7)#28,667
23. 74128 16.4% 36.7% (-20.3)#565 46.1% (-29.7)#28,669
24. 74146 15.6% 36.7% (-21.1)#570 46.1% (-30.5)#28,909
25. 74126 12.0% 36.7% (-24.7)#597 46.1% (-34.1)#29,942
26. 74115 10.9% 36.7% (-25.8)#605 46.1% (-35.2)#30,171
27. 74110 10.8% 36.7% (-25.9)#608 46.1% (-35.3)#30,189

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
65.0%
#2
60.3%
#3
58.4%
#4
55.9%
#5
54.2%
#6
54.1%
#7
50.7%
#8
50.4%
#9
50.0%
#10
48.4%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK?
74137 has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK with 65.0%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Tulsa is 36.5%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Oklahoma is 36.7%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in the United States is 46.1%.