Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa

61.5%
82.4%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1.7414682.4%64.5%(+17.9)#2166.9%(+15.5)#1,709
2.7411679.0%64.5%(+14.5)#3466.9%(+12.1)#2,662
3.7411579.0%64.5%(+14.5)#3666.9%(+12.1)#2,677
4.7412878.6%64.5%(+14.2)#3866.9%(+11.7)#2,799
5.7410876.4%64.5%(+11.9)#4366.9%(+9.46)#3,952
6.7411075.4%64.5%(+10.9)#5266.9%(+8.54)#4,560
7.7414574.9%64.5%(+10.4)#5966.9%(+8.01)#4,994
8.7413472.6%64.5%(+8.06)#8566.9%(+5.66)#7,219
9.7412972.3%64.5%(+7.78)#9366.9%(+5.38)#7,530
10.7412672.1%64.5%(+7.57)#10166.9%(+5.17)#7,755
11.7410771.7%64.5%(+7.22)#10666.9%(+4.82)#8,159
12.7413171.2%64.5%(+6.75)#12266.9%(+4.35)#8,760
13.7413670.9%64.5%(+6.44)#13466.9%(+4.04)#9,131
14.7411270.7%64.5%(+6.22)#13866.9%(+3.82)#9,429
15.7410670.3%64.5%(+5.82)#14966.9%(+3.42)#9,942
16.7413069.6%64.5%(+5.07)#16266.9%(+2.67)#10,958
17.7413269.5%64.5%(+5.03)#16366.9%(+2.63)#11,012
18.7412769.0%64.5%(+4.49)#17266.9%(+2.08)#11,774
19.7413368.9%64.5%(+4.43)#17366.9%(+2.03)#11,855
20.7417167.7%64.5%(+3.17)#20066.9%(+0.767)#13,537
21.7410567.6%64.5%(+3.12)#20166.9%(+0.712)#13,614
22.7410366.1%64.5%(+1.61)#22866.9%(-0.792)#15,565
23.7412065.6%64.5%(+1.13)#24266.9%(-1.28)#16,221
24.7413764.9%64.5%(+0.398)#26066.9%(-2.00)#17,143
25.7413564.8%64.5%(+0.329)#26266.9%(-2.07)#17,240
26.7411964.0%64.5%(-0.470)#27866.9%(-2.87)#18,180
27.7410462.4%64.5%(-2.07)#33166.9%(-4.47)#19,977
28.7411461.5%64.5%(-2.99)#35966.9%(-5.40)#20,956

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
82.4%
#2
79.0%
#3
79.0%
#4
78.6%
#5
76.4%
#6
75.4%
#7
74.9%
#8
72.6%
#9
72.3%
#10
72.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa, OK?
74146 has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa, OK with 82.4%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Tulsa is 70.4%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Oklahoma is 64.5%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.