Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Household Income | $200k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa

0.40%
23.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Households with Income > $200k vs State vs National
1.7410323.9%6.3%(+17.6)#1011.4%(+12.5)#2,400
2.7413722.3%6.3%(+16.0)#1211.4%(+10.9)#2,718
3.7411420.5%6.3%(+14.2)#1511.4%(+9.10)#3,159
4.7410515.9%6.3%(+9.60)#2411.4%(+4.50)#4,605
5.7413213.4%6.3%(+7.10)#3111.4%(+2.00)#5,804
6.7413311.3%6.3%(+5.00)#4411.4%(-0.100)#7,140
7.7412010.2%6.3%(+3.90)#5811.4%(-1.20)#8,085
8.741348.2%6.3%(+1.90)#9011.4%(-3.20)#10,118
9.741358.0%6.3%(+1.70)#9411.4%(-3.40)#10,372
10.741367.2%6.3%(+0.900)#10711.4%(-4.20)#11,489
11.741167.0%6.3%(+0.700)#11511.4%(-4.40)#11,823
12.741316.3%6.3%(=0.000)#13811.4%(-5.10)#12,988
13.741045.2%6.3%(-1.10)#17311.4%(-6.20)#15,136
14.741194.6%6.3%(-1.70)#22611.4%(-6.80)#16,645
15.741084.5%6.3%(-1.80)#23311.4%(-6.90)#16,836
16.741452.9%6.3%(-3.40)#34411.4%(-8.50)#21,172
17.741122.6%6.3%(-3.70)#37111.4%(-8.80)#22,032
18.741072.3%6.3%(-4.00)#40111.4%(-9.10)#22,923
19.741272.2%6.3%(-4.10)#41311.4%(-9.20)#23,202
20.741292.0%6.3%(-4.30)#42911.4%(-9.40)#23,760
21.741061.2%6.3%(-5.10)#49811.4%(-10.2)#25,762
22.741261.2%6.3%(-5.10)#49911.4%(-10.2)#25,773
23.741151.0%6.3%(-5.30)#51211.4%(-10.4)#26,181
24.741281.0%6.3%(-5.30)#51311.4%(-10.4)#26,194
25.741460.90%6.3%(-5.40)#52011.4%(-10.5)#26,384
26.741300.80%6.3%(-5.50)#52411.4%(-10.6)#26,633
27.741100.40%6.3%(-5.90)#54811.4%(-11.0)#27,247

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
23.9%
#2
22.3%
#3
20.5%
#4
15.9%
#5
13.4%
#6
11.3%
#7
10.2%
#8
8.2%
#9
8.0%
#10
7.2%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK with 23.9%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa is 7.6%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Oklahoma is 6.3%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States is 11.4%.