Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Household Income | $200k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa

0.40%
23.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Households with Income > $200k vs State vs National
1. 74103 23.9% 6.3% (+17.6)#10 11.4% (+12.5)#2,400
2. 74137 22.3% 6.3% (+16.0)#12 11.4% (+10.9)#2,718
3. 74114 20.5% 6.3% (+14.2)#15 11.4% (+9.10)#3,159
4. 74105 15.9% 6.3% (+9.60)#24 11.4% (+4.50)#4,605
5. 74132 13.4% 6.3% (+7.10)#31 11.4% (+2.00)#5,804
6. 74133 11.3% 6.3% (+5.00)#44 11.4% (-0.100)#7,140
7. 74120 10.2% 6.3% (+3.90)#58 11.4% (-1.20)#8,085
8. 74134 8.2% 6.3% (+1.90)#90 11.4% (-3.20)#10,118
9. 74135 8.0% 6.3% (+1.70)#94 11.4% (-3.40)#10,372
10. 74136 7.2% 6.3% (+0.900)#107 11.4% (-4.20)#11,489
11. 74116 7.0% 6.3% (+0.700)#115 11.4% (-4.40)#11,823
12. 74131 6.3% 6.3% (=0.000)#138 11.4% (-5.10)#12,988
13. 74104 5.2% 6.3% (-1.10)#173 11.4% (-6.20)#15,136
14. 74119 4.6% 6.3% (-1.70)#226 11.4% (-6.80)#16,645
15. 74108 4.5% 6.3% (-1.80)#233 11.4% (-6.90)#16,836
16. 74145 2.9% 6.3% (-3.40)#344 11.4% (-8.50)#21,172
17. 74112 2.6% 6.3% (-3.70)#371 11.4% (-8.80)#22,032
18. 74107 2.3% 6.3% (-4.00)#401 11.4% (-9.10)#22,923
19. 74127 2.2% 6.3% (-4.10)#413 11.4% (-9.20)#23,202
20. 74129 2.0% 6.3% (-4.30)#429 11.4% (-9.40)#23,760
21. 74106 1.2% 6.3% (-5.10)#498 11.4% (-10.2)#25,762
22. 74126 1.2% 6.3% (-5.10)#499 11.4% (-10.2)#25,773
23. 74115 1.0% 6.3% (-5.30)#512 11.4% (-10.4)#26,181
24. 74128 1.0% 6.3% (-5.30)#513 11.4% (-10.4)#26,194
25. 74146 0.90% 6.3% (-5.40)#520 11.4% (-10.5)#26,384
26. 74130 0.80% 6.3% (-5.50)#524 11.4% (-10.6)#26,633
27. 74110 0.40% 6.3% (-5.90)#548 11.4% (-11.0)#27,247

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
23.9%
#2
22.3%
#3
20.5%
#4
15.9%
#5
13.4%
#6
11.3%
#7
10.2%
#8
8.2%
#9
8.0%
#10
7.2%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK with 23.9%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Tulsa is 7.6%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in Oklahoma is 6.3%.
What is the Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Households with Income Above $200,000 in the United States is 11.4%.