Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa

60.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1.741329.8%20.8%(-11.1)#8417.0%(-7.20)#7,693
2.7413710.5%20.8%(-10.3)#9617.0%(-6.43)#8,264
3.7413310.6%20.8%(-10.2)#9717.0%(-6.36)#8,318
4.7411412.7%20.8%(-8.18)#12117.0%(-4.32)#9,761
5.7412012.8%20.8%(-8.00)#12417.0%(-4.14)#9,890
6.7413514.8%20.8%(-6.02)#15717.0%(-2.16)#11,224
7.7413415.0%20.8%(-5.84)#16417.0%(-1.98)#11,341
8.7414520.0%20.8%(-0.803)#24117.0%(+3.06)#14,284
9.7410523.1%20.8%(+2.27)#29317.0%(+6.13)#15,795
10.7413627.4%20.8%(+6.55)#35217.0%(+10.4)#17,497
11.7411228.4%20.8%(+7.54)#36317.0%(+11.4)#17,844
12.7410431.7%20.8%(+10.8)#39517.0%(+14.7)#18,840
13.7412832.1%20.8%(+11.3)#40217.0%(+15.1)#18,970
14.7412935.9%20.8%(+15.0)#44017.0%(+18.9)#19,921
15.7414635.9%20.8%(+15.1)#44317.0%(+18.9)#19,937
16.7412736.2%20.8%(+15.4)#44817.0%(+19.2)#19,999
17.7410837.2%20.8%(+16.4)#45617.0%(+20.3)#20,218
18.7411538.2%20.8%(+17.3)#46217.0%(+21.2)#20,411
19.7410740.3%20.8%(+19.5)#47517.0%(+23.3)#20,795
20.7411640.3%20.8%(+19.5)#47617.0%(+23.4)#20,798
21.7413140.5%20.8%(+19.7)#48017.0%(+23.6)#20,835
22.7411041.2%20.8%(+20.3)#48817.0%(+24.2)#20,945
23.7412647.2%20.8%(+26.4)#51117.0%(+30.3)#21,753
24.7410653.3%20.8%(+32.5)#52317.0%(+36.3)#22,361
25.7413059.0%20.8%(+38.1)#53717.0%(+42.0)#22,767

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
9.8%
#4
10.5%
#5
10.6%
#6
12.7%
#7
12.8%
#8
14.8%
#9
15.0%
#10
20.0%
What zip code has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK with 9.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa is 27.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.