Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa

59.0%
9.8%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. 74132 9.8% 20.8% (-11.1)#84 17.0% (-7.20)#7,693
2. 74137 10.5% 20.8% (-10.3)#96 17.0% (-6.43)#8,264
3. 74133 10.6% 20.8% (-10.2)#97 17.0% (-6.36)#8,318
4. 74114 12.7% 20.8% (-8.18)#121 17.0% (-4.32)#9,761
5. 74120 12.8% 20.8% (-8.00)#124 17.0% (-4.14)#9,890
6. 74135 14.8% 20.8% (-6.02)#157 17.0% (-2.16)#11,224
7. 74134 15.0% 20.8% (-5.84)#164 17.0% (-1.98)#11,341
8. 74145 20.0% 20.8% (-0.803)#241 17.0% (+3.06)#14,284
9. 74105 23.1% 20.8% (+2.27)#293 17.0% (+6.13)#15,795
10. 74136 27.4% 20.8% (+6.55)#352 17.0% (+10.4)#17,497
11. 74112 28.4% 20.8% (+7.54)#363 17.0% (+11.4)#17,844
12. 74104 31.7% 20.8% (+10.8)#395 17.0% (+14.7)#18,840
13. 74128 32.1% 20.8% (+11.3)#402 17.0% (+15.1)#18,970
14. 74129 35.9% 20.8% (+15.0)#440 17.0% (+18.9)#19,921
15. 74146 35.9% 20.8% (+15.1)#443 17.0% (+18.9)#19,937
16. 74127 36.2% 20.8% (+15.4)#448 17.0% (+19.2)#19,999
17. 74108 37.2% 20.8% (+16.4)#456 17.0% (+20.3)#20,218
18. 74115 38.2% 20.8% (+17.3)#462 17.0% (+21.2)#20,411
19. 74107 40.3% 20.8% (+19.5)#475 17.0% (+23.3)#20,795
20. 74116 40.3% 20.8% (+19.5)#476 17.0% (+23.4)#20,798
21. 74131 40.5% 20.8% (+19.7)#480 17.0% (+23.6)#20,835
22. 74110 41.2% 20.8% (+20.3)#488 17.0% (+24.2)#20,945
23. 74126 47.2% 20.8% (+26.4)#511 17.0% (+30.3)#21,753
24. 74106 53.3% 20.8% (+32.5)#523 17.0% (+36.3)#22,361
25. 74130 59.0% 20.8% (+38.1)#537 17.0% (+42.0)#22,767

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
9.8%
#4
10.5%
#5
10.6%
#6
12.7%
#7
12.8%
#8
14.8%
#9
15.0%
#10
20.0%
What zip code has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK with 9.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa is 27.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.