Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Detached Home Residency
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa

3.6%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Detached Home Residency vs State vs National
1. 74117 100.0% 74.4% (+25.6)#14 62.5% (+37.5)#1,709
2. 74126 92.6% 74.4% (+18.2)#55 62.5% (+30.1)#4,968
3. 74114 90.0% 74.4% (+15.6)#82 62.5% (+27.5)#6,571
4. 74110 87.9% 74.4% (+13.5)#114 62.5% (+25.4)#8,002
5. 74127 82.8% 74.4% (+8.40)#208 62.5% (+20.3)#11,936
6. 74108 82.1% 74.4% (+7.70)#233 62.5% (+19.6)#12,529
7. 74112 80.2% 74.4% (+5.80)#272 62.5% (+17.7)#14,033
8. 74115 79.8% 74.4% (+5.40)#283 62.5% (+17.3)#14,332
9. 74130 78.8% 74.4% (+4.40)#306 62.5% (+16.3)#15,155
10. 74131 75.8% 74.4% (+1.40)#373 62.5% (+13.3)#17,572
11. 74106 73.3% 74.4% (-1.10)#420 62.5% (+10.8)#19,383
12. 74134 72.2% 74.4% (-2.20)#447 62.5% (+9.70)#20,151
13. 74107 71.7% 74.4% (-2.70)#455 62.5% (+9.20)#20,525
14. 74128 71.1% 74.4% (-3.30)#468 62.5% (+8.60)#20,961
15. 74104 71.0% 74.4% (-3.40)#472 62.5% (+8.50)#21,041
16. 74129 66.8% 74.4% (-7.60)#527 62.5% (+4.30)#23,497
17. 74145 66.8% 74.4% (-7.60)#528 62.5% (+4.30)#23,498
18. 74137 65.9% 74.4% (-8.50)#540 62.5% (+3.40)#23,984
19. 74132 64.5% 74.4% (-9.90)#558 62.5% (+2.00)#24,687
20. 74105 61.5% 74.4% (-12.9)#582 62.5% (-1.00)#25,922
21. 74135 60.6% 74.4% (-13.8)#591 62.5% (-1.90)#26,242
22. 74133 54.6% 74.4% (-19.8)#616 62.5% (-7.90)#28,166
23. 74120 46.2% 74.4% (-28.2)#631 62.5% (-16.3)#29,770
24. 74146 45.9% 74.4% (-28.5)#632 62.5% (-16.6)#29,809
25. 74116 42.6% 74.4% (-31.8)#639 62.5% (-19.9)#30,246
26. 74136 33.5% 74.4% (-40.9)#644 62.5% (-29.0)#31,077
27. 74119 13.0% 74.4% (-61.4)#649 62.5% (-49.5)#32,007
28. 74103 3.6% 74.4% (-70.8)#653 62.5% (-58.9)#32,366

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
100.0%
#2
92.6%
#3
90.0%
#4
87.9%
#5
82.8%
#6
82.1%
#7
80.2%
#8
79.8%
#9
78.8%
#10
75.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK?
74117 has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Tulsa is 64.1%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Oklahoma is 74.4%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States is 62.5%.