Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Birth Rate | In Labor Force
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa

100.0
12.0
Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Births / 1,000 Women vs State vs National
1. 74119 12.0 51.0 (-39.0)#18 48.0 (-36.0)#1,097
2. 74116 23.0 51.0 (-28.0)#64 48.0 (-25.0)#3,495
3. 74114 28.0 51.0 (-23.0)#87 48.0 (-20.0)#4,841
4. 74127 28.0 51.0 (-23.0)#88 48.0 (-20.0)#4,846
5. 74129 30.0 51.0 (-21.0)#96 48.0 (-18.0)#5,431
6. 74104 30.0 51.0 (-21.0)#97 48.0 (-18.0)#5,459
7. 74131 32.0 51.0 (-19.0)#111 48.0 (-16.0)#6,161
8. 74126 36.0 51.0 (-15.0)#129 48.0 (-12.0)#7,329
9. 74128 37.0 51.0 (-14.0)#136 48.0 (-11.0)#7,645
10. 74146 38.0 51.0 (-13.0)#148 48.0 (-10.00)#7,945
11. 74135 39.0 51.0 (-12.0)#153 48.0 (-9.00)#8,286
12. 74145 40.0 51.0 (-11.0)#164 48.0 (-8.00)#8,608
13. 74120 41.0 51.0 (-10.00)#172 48.0 (-7.00)#9,050
14. 74112 43.0 51.0 (-8.00)#187 48.0 (-5.00)#9,619
15. 74107 43.0 51.0 (-8.00)#188 48.0 (-5.00)#9,631
16. 74137 45.0 51.0 (-6.00)#198 48.0 (-3.00)#10,199
17. 74110 50.0 51.0 (-1.000)#223 48.0 (+2.00)#11,796
18. 74134 53.0 51.0 (+2.00)#241 48.0 (+5.00)#12,643
19. 74136 57.0 51.0 (+6.00)#263 48.0 (+9.00)#13,706
20. 74133 61.0 51.0 (+10.00)#282 48.0 (+13.0)#14,579
21. 74108 61.0 51.0 (+10.00)#285 48.0 (+13.0)#14,685
22. 74106 66.0 51.0 (+15.0)#306 48.0 (+18.0)#15,732
23. 74115 67.0 51.0 (+16.0)#315 48.0 (+19.0)#15,897
24. 74105 73.0 51.0 (+22.0)#331 48.0 (+25.0)#16,966
25. 74130 94.0 51.0 (+43.0)#387 48.0 (+46.0)#19,342
26. 74132 100.0 51.0 (+49.0)#404 48.0 (+52.0)#19,717

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.0
#2
12.0
#3
23.0
#4
28.0
#5
28.0
#6
30.0
#7
30.0
#8
32.0
#9
36.0
#10
37.0
What zip code has the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK?
74119 has the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK with 12.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa is 50.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Oklahoma?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Oklahoma is 51.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States is 48.0.