Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Birth Rate | In Labor Force
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa

100.0
0.0
Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Births / 1,000 Women vs State vs National
1.7411912.051.0(-39.0)#1848.0(-36.0)#1,097
2.7411623.051.0(-28.0)#6448.0(-25.0)#3,495
3.7411428.051.0(-23.0)#8748.0(-20.0)#4,841
4.7412728.051.0(-23.0)#8848.0(-20.0)#4,846
5.7412930.051.0(-21.0)#9648.0(-18.0)#5,431
6.7410430.051.0(-21.0)#9748.0(-18.0)#5,459
7.7413132.051.0(-19.0)#11148.0(-16.0)#6,161
8.7412636.051.0(-15.0)#12948.0(-12.0)#7,329
9.7412837.051.0(-14.0)#13648.0(-11.0)#7,645
10.7414638.051.0(-13.0)#14848.0(-10.00)#7,945
11.7413539.051.0(-12.0)#15348.0(-9.00)#8,286
12.7414540.051.0(-11.0)#16448.0(-8.00)#8,608
13.7412041.051.0(-10.00)#17248.0(-7.00)#9,050
14.7411243.051.0(-8.00)#18748.0(-5.00)#9,619
15.7410743.051.0(-8.00)#18848.0(-5.00)#9,631
16.7413745.051.0(-6.00)#19848.0(-3.00)#10,199
17.7411050.051.0(-1.000)#22348.0(+2.00)#11,796
18.7413453.051.0(+2.00)#24148.0(+5.00)#12,643
19.7413657.051.0(+6.00)#26348.0(+9.00)#13,706
20.7413361.051.0(+10.00)#28248.0(+13.0)#14,579
21.7410861.051.0(+10.00)#28548.0(+13.0)#14,685
22.7410666.051.0(+15.0)#30648.0(+18.0)#15,732
23.7411567.051.0(+16.0)#31548.0(+19.0)#15,897
24.7410573.051.0(+22.0)#33148.0(+25.0)#16,966
25.7413094.051.0(+43.0)#38748.0(+46.0)#19,342
26.74132100.051.0(+49.0)#40448.0(+52.0)#19,717

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.0
#2
12.0
#3
23.0
#4
28.0
#5
28.0
#6
30.0
#7
30.0
#8
32.0
#9
36.0
#10
37.0
What zip code has the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK?
74119 has the Lowest Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK with 12.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa, OK?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Tulsa is 50.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Oklahoma?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in Oklahoma is 51.0.
What is the Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States?
Number Births per 1,000 Women in Labor Force in the United States is 48.0.