Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha

3.2%
64.7%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha, NE

Zip Code Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. 68102 64.7% 29.1% (+35.6)#71 33.1% (+31.6)#3,745
2. 68131 56.8% 29.1% (+27.7)#86 33.1% (+23.7)#5,084
3. 68108 51.4% 29.1% (+22.3)#97 33.1% (+18.3)#6,246
4. 68111 48.4% 29.1% (+19.3)#115 33.1% (+15.3)#7,143
5. 68110 47.2% 29.1% (+18.1)#117 33.1% (+14.0)#7,491
6. 68105 42.2% 29.1% (+13.1)#137 33.1% (+9.02)#9,030
7. 68138 41.0% 29.1% (+11.9)#144 33.1% (+7.84)#9,429
8. 68157 35.6% 29.1% (+6.52)#180 33.1% (+2.46)#11,451
9. 68104 34.0% 29.1% (+4.95)#190 33.1% (+0.884)#12,014
10. 68107 30.5% 29.1% (+1.42)#209 33.1% (-2.65)#13,503
11. 68134 29.2% 29.1% (+0.145)#217 33.1% (-3.92)#14,025
12. 68112 28.0% 29.1% (-1.09)#220 33.1% (-5.16)#14,535
13. 68124 24.3% 29.1% (-4.81)#234 33.1% (-8.87)#16,000
14. 68135 20.5% 29.1% (-8.59)#252 33.1% (-12.7)#17,494
15. 68144 20.5% 29.1% (-8.60)#253 33.1% (-12.7)#17,496
16. 68122 20.0% 29.1% (-9.03)#255 33.1% (-13.1)#17,633
17. 68164 19.4% 29.1% (-9.64)#261 33.1% (-13.7)#17,932
18. 68152 19.3% 29.1% (-9.74)#262 33.1% (-13.8)#17,970
19. 68127 18.4% 29.1% (-10.6)#267 33.1% (-14.7)#18,313
20. 68136 16.0% 29.1% (-13.0)#280 33.1% (-17.1)#19,207
21. 68106 12.7% 29.1% (-16.4)#286 33.1% (-20.4)#20,380
22. 68154 11.4% 29.1% (-17.6)#294 33.1% (-21.7)#20,762
23. 68114 10.9% 29.1% (-18.2)#297 33.1% (-22.3)#20,957
24. 68130 8.3% 29.1% (-20.8)#309 33.1% (-24.9)#21,656
25. 68117 6.8% 29.1% (-22.3)#313 33.1% (-26.4)#22,036
26. 68116 6.2% 29.1% (-22.9)#316 33.1% (-27.0)#22,150
27. 68132 4.7% 29.1% (-24.3)#321 33.1% (-28.4)#22,447
28. 68137 3.2% 29.1% (-25.9)#328 33.1% (-29.9)#22,684

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha, NE are:
#1
64.7%
#2
56.8%
#3
51.4%
#4
48.4%
#5
47.2%
#6
42.2%
#7
41.0%
#8
35.6%
#9
34.0%
#10
30.5%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha, NE?
68102 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha, NE with 64.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha, NE?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Omaha is 27.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska is 29.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.