Creek vs English Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,449,286 people shows no correlation between the proportion of English within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in English. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 19.6 English.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and English communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $102,021, a difference of 29.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $94,429, a difference of 26.2%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $103,684, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,805, a difference of 12.0%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $38,196, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and English communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.3%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and English communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and English communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and English communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.1%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.19%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and English communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and English communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.3%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and English communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 10.0%).