Creek vs Immigrants from Dominica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,327,011 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.967. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.127% in Immigrants from Dominica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 127.2 Immigrants from Dominica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 35.5%), median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $37,825, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,301, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $47,651, a difference of 2.3%), median family income ($82,560 compared to $85,411, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $50,071, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 47.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 41.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.3%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.79%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 185.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 71.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 18.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 40.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 59.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.7%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (52.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 0.65%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 65.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.8%).